IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC3F3A0FCA for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=XLoiqPA1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=gfS5dgKf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KySE_lTvf9it for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D843A0FC4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1091; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1592846909; x=1594056509; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zxk8xfLN6Mdiwrrp3CNqVfxI5S9RlFTP3TtbbIelWng=; b=XLoiqPA1sYvQgmQJ8D33Exp9ajofU4mymYgL0QLHgjtj6vCSWoHUOKMC Nlsci0bKGAEEoQ2MxWt4qOtq+3ZBKQqjzl7XMVAVov6ojTc79fiIOZFO+ E+OPQvcm0fJ0vQuyQ3Dqfl28jTRIuop7W4m8k+mraoLm37AykBZ7RY8YZ c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:6qg4lRHP8cqRKsWIXYzzSp1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e401QObUoDS6vYCgO3T4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTAQMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS8n7blzW5Ha16G1aFhD2LwEgIOPzF8bbhNi20Obn/ZrVbk1IiTOxbKk0Ig+xqFDat9Idhs1pLaNixw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CQBQAE6fBe/4gNJK1mHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQFAgUqBUlEHb1gvLAqHYAONQ5hUgUKBEANVCwEBAQwBARgNCAIEAQGERwKCKwIkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVsMhXIBAQEBAwEBECgGAQEsDAsEAgEIEQQBAR8QJwsdCAIEARIIGoMFgksDLgEOq10CgTmIYXSBNIMBAQEFgUZBgysYgg4DBoE4gmeJfBqBQT+BEUOCTT6CXAEBAwGBJgESASODRYIttFcKglqIQpEHgnGJJJJmkSuKFZQzAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFqImZwcBU7gjUBM1AXAg2OHoNxhRSFQnQ3AgYIAQEDCXyOewGBEAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,268,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="790753634"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 Jun 2020 17:28:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 05MHSSiq026297 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:28:28 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:28:27 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:28:27 -0500
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:28:27 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DC8LFbkMBALkSLB5x8lnDMmxLGDYcky46n6hfcl6qffIEkPMgZAVXOAbi8WD/o1HJVLxIVO0wQYwbnn5UZx8xOq0SiDu73hH3oYIIQrF5pEwDjuUDLI6X1JvQ9fwAMdsmy4wnxYmorSv9UOWDgN6xwx5vEIkolsGXyAc0ofAhSBoLhFzOqSmnu2sJa39lVKoFsL/RLJEblK9WMJsc3g3C2nDxNF2N4+Z8G2vOpQBY420ETJi03JpIBn7SYYGSmsohZsVcO4wrZRqhbW9FWCbi6gUAawGh7rh84DKPxfKA9SXG70iNVh9EIG2+3+oCbCrvioDb1UfgCf8L/oJjCyUXw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zxk8xfLN6Mdiwrrp3CNqVfxI5S9RlFTP3TtbbIelWng=; b=lUmTwgMEWhMdKO5Oc1QUW2L8gmFNi1p8FBKaNzR+rZlxX2sQ3tDOKVPZHtdm5PGt0vq7G2wxEWZbshxQe+uTtXRp7C2rnPNP8PUzSffyMXFIuEdrId4wg2j+BA5Ye5ps87TWCrApG8o7Drb6BnUg15hmRXaX5nYf4/yX7YxSqQnmh7vjd8F3bS8vMYAbrES/3Sr/Ksy6C7Ppic38IjVssjiHbYTUu9YVQrtstufyW5i0zbZQOqWCt5DIy14UAnbSo/AEpB0z1v0gSZyGRRttILzFi8kSyaIglCFXmhsBZ9xo6snR3YY5u1bNUQN+OTemaCdk3LqQlhJLBRga01PtWQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zxk8xfLN6Mdiwrrp3CNqVfxI5S9RlFTP3TtbbIelWng=; b=gfS5dgKfnG2F/KVk1rVUFYT9rIAY3JanW6lclV4bOSNfNRo65M7gbvLTNjsofwPSwfMs5EFYD0m4GxYLos263I7/V4Mzs2NFYLJnWQO5GQVm5I4y9EUF5GH0qv3KCayxv9b+DRjt6CBh/lACdQasutdp8FYQY8ZtSbsgjJBg720=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5f::22) by MWHPR11MB1471.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:b::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.22; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:28:26 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::658f:69a3:2fc5:d430]) by MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::658f:69a3:2fc5:d430%6]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:28:24 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
Thread-Index: AQHWPJ/K06pL69ptTEOMOVXLRNy4u6jk+xzw
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:28:24 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB4570ACE956FF1FF59D8B8D12C1970@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [72.163.220.13]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 55a56173-4ae4-4366-c057-08d816d1aaf5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR11MB1471:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR11MB14715A8F1BD78FD9524C4735C1970@MWHPR11MB1471.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: xk/bf9WbHU5gvmHyHDBRbBdKj1vCrV/6Vm9fP7k3nEEXTEQcx3AF5FHKdWeePwg2YJNZm2ugD+zxvtv9sl81DXnIr85lxt0znLox1/BtAcFudtY2f4m5G/7eVP2hCw1f3G5bMFjlKYtVoyzPLsK2fsAsTNThvJYlwISSd6nTy2tfwIfitlU25A3wwr7BuckNXlMHoLCC9FOkQmDuJdMT4ZCsM33fZaICJ+RLeBr7NZXptFzL5MNkO1YwO/NcTNhWCPeO3CLP2n4kQun81WoxchNWQtY7Omuvv7xmfg6dmlpGfhxFt8RT0vQMP4A4vykxj1qTGqfidpz4oZVTUVltkHBkmJsJbGB/tIOwdz2diBLiDd2vyJIe/Bte3/4u1z8wDam8qKhwvgHUHT+belHDqg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(396003)(376002)(33656002)(83380400001)(76116006)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(5660300002)(8936002)(86362001)(52536014)(8676002)(66946007)(316002)(55016002)(9686003)(2906002)(110136005)(71200400001)(186003)(26005)(53546011)(478600001)(7696005)(6506007)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 55a56173-4ae4-4366-c057-08d816d1aaf5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2020 17:28:24.2723 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Q9OmABCgr8+erfZNnfvEPNZ8ebMj3A3eQC+Rt7AhmRZSe7ZlCJSnZa0xzwXWLqqryPmhLcexwyGzMRBMPnRr1Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR11MB1471
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2GUwc5U8eB_4Z_0YLz9FaHUBs8Q>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:28:31 -0000

Hi All,

I support the adoption of this draft. It incorporates the key CP signalling constructs for PCEP in line with draft-spring-segment-routing-policy that are required for signalling of multiple CPs for an SR Policy.

Thanks,
Ketan  

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 07 June 2020 13:15
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email