Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pceps-07 available

Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk> Mon, 27 June 2016 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <nite@hq.sk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB66B12D15E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hq.sk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dtC5EG0RIx_W for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hq.sk (hq.sk [81.89.59.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB8212D15A for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.137.1.13] (46.229.239.158.host.vnet.sk [46.229.239.158]) by mail.hq.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27B69242EA2; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:11:31 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hq.sk; s=mail; t=1467029491; bh=YVDw0M9zaSQ307g5/PEckX2eH8IbT2NlGLRjF53V8rk=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=EMEVRT6EsAHpmiXwZDT/i1uUwEWTnGYIqL/3eX0a+V5ZFTZtysZQMtxbVvR8Bd1r3 o/CAig4ymTxWHJs6MTcLcSLq44oQJwf3iVuvS/AkmfhGCIl7NVmh6oaBH7d44Jhq9S HcGmVc/YNdgQr5iWtEcI4ntE4VTjq1kuMjaU5fkc=
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
References: <06EC97F2-E307-4AB9-AF08-ABFAAAE20B42@telefonica.com> <56A15221.1090808@hq.sk> <BLUPR0201MB19089FE43EF57C31D4125C4284DF0@BLUPR0201MB1908.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Varga <nite@hq.sk>
Message-ID: <ef6fbb0a-44c6-a705-52f4-3a894ac21e44@hq.sk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:11:29 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0201MB19089FE43EF57C31D4125C4284DF0@BLUPR0201MB1908.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nHXLFRKxUW8qLLX6Qt853isE4HqOBeWPF"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2cBi0qc9PRzdYk9k2v_jXAPnEnw>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pceps-07 available
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:11:34 -0000

On 02/02/2016 04:21 PM, Jonathan Hardwick wrote:
> Hi Robert

Hello Jon.

sorry for the delay, PCE work has been on the back burner :-(

> (I’m answering as WG chair.)
> 
>  
> 
> Sorry for the slow reply.  I would expect the progress of
> draft-ietf-pce-pceps through to RFC to be reasonably fast, so I’m not
> sure early code point allocation should be needed.  The main risk would
> be a conflict with the stateful PCE drafts, should the new message in
> the PCEPS draft be allocated a clashing code point with the values that
> the stateful drafts have “recommended” for their messages.

I agree.

> I think it is possible that PCEPS will leap-frog stateful PCE on the way
> to RFC, so I think the best way to proceed is to obtain an early
> allocation for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce and
> draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp.  To do this we would only require help
> from the stateful draft authors (e.g. you) to answer any questions that
> IANA has about your text (which would happen sooner or later anyway
> :-).  Would you like us to start an early allocation for these drafts?

I think this is a fair assessment. I can answer any questions and an
early allocation would be an excellent way of ensuring we do not get
clashes.

Thanks,
Robert