IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

"Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com> Thu, 05 May 2022 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pengshuping@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDCBC159A32; Thu, 5 May 2022 03:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FADAIs9amOYo; Thu, 5 May 2022 03:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25718C159527; Thu, 5 May 2022 03:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Kv8Jg2Fx3z67kP9; Thu, 5 May 2022 17:57:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from canpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.17) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 5 May 2022 12:02:21 +0200
Received: from canpemm500008.china.huawei.com (7.192.105.151) by canpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.192.104.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:02:20 +0800
Received: from canpemm500008.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.151]) by canpemm500008.china.huawei.com ([7.192.105.151]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:02:19 +0800
From: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org" <draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Thread-Index: AQHYQr5b73XaKm7qXEeeIVm25IxGua0MLOUAgAP4DLA=
Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 10:02:19 +0000
Message-ID: <f8f03a43be124732bced65f1b43d3965@huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5bC95SwqbPC-Fm1-bTyAmaVOb-O5Bg4CKqe3tSe=LUzZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP7zK5aNUUQyY4K_TkodfV=XcLrS4jmZpNAbN+7rGtpNNRFPwg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5aNUUQyY4K_TkodfV=XcLrS4jmZpNAbN+7rGtpNNRFPwg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.41.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f8f03a43be124732bced65f1b43d3965huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/2yoUmZ8V0iyIwSTji9Z91PAqmHo>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 10:02:30 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

As an author of this draft, I would like to thank the Chairs of both WGs for the guidance. We will post the PCE document and start drafting the SPRING one.

Thank you!

Best Regards,
Shuping

From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 11:17 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org; spring-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

Hi WG,

Thanks for providing your feedback and discussion on the adoption of this draft.

The discussion on this thread as well as a chat with the SPRING chairs confirms the need for a document in the SPRING WG that can be referred to by the protocol extensions in PCE (and IDR). There is also no opposition to the actual protocol work in PCE.

Thus, the chairs conclude the adoption poll and adopt this I-D in the PCE WG. The chairs also ask the authors (and whoever is willing to contribute) to produce a document in the SPRING WG in parallel and continue the discussion on the SPRING mailing list. Post-adoption, the PCE document would need to remove any duplicate content and refer to the spring document instead.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 9:39 PM Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com<mailto:dd@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote:
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th April 2022.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email