IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update

julien.meuric@orange.com Mon, 19 August 2024 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A618C151527; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fuqlRN-fXtbs; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.orange.com (smtp-out.orange.com [80.12.126.238]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BCD5C15109C; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 02:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; i=@orange.com; q=dns/txt; s=orange002; t=1724059759; x=1755595759; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references: in-reply-to:from; bh=iSSuAaVdHDBeAhD9xLYPCcRBgVzOjsi5ocloiUPQ+zs=; b=A8t6FsZ0oisCuDicOo37W+L952qC+QzrKyyhn23xoVkmO2n4C0bZMBfS CdvI64CYiRAyfLreY5g8uPY/Hhd/XvO14cxwRcU+HAWqu4qhr14uyW+eB D31P8WgUgIx7Esbo0XrkY0M+hqpIXGu5A9nC0yutNokMbo9JARxaqh1+S XIvDZpuYQ4X/1fN/j9XQun/yT1Dm0YIZY3w8d4a1CoXLaE/dG8k9x2FUy 96r5zKh95fLdbrizc5PVT6QVFWtUHSi2WwQohl4lOZTDdvZ4n+uv7s6t9 RzCsvlTHKFCkaCYXegkwKfVZh2Q0rLyCrusSCmzhTALXCH/DkPOR9PW7u Q==;
Received: from unknown (HELO opfedv1rlp0b.nor.fr.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by smtp-out.orange.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Aug 2024 11:29:13 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by opfedv1rlp0b.nor.fr.ftgroup with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 19 Aug 2024 11:29:13 +0200
Received: from [x.x.x.x] [x.x.x.x] by OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup [x.x.x.x] with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:29:12 +0200
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,158,1719871200"; d="p7s'346?scan'346,208,346";a="182997755"
Message-ID: <849e2faa-d2b5-4917-9f91-30014147d48b@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 11:29:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, draft-dhody-pce-iana-update@ietf.org, draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors@ietf.org
References: <cf19c561-2070-4f5d-a759-d1dc6faaf65f@orange.com>
Content-Language: en-US, fr
Organization: Orange
In-Reply-To: <cf19c561-2070-4f5d-a759-d1dc6faaf65f@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms070902050000030209070608"
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.27.53]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX208.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.9) To OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.16)
Message-ID-Hash: VIP2PIHHJICENFNDK3OENUQIQML72RI5
X-Message-ID-Hash: VIP2PIHHJICENFNDK3OENUQIQML72RI5
X-MailFrom: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Re: Adoption Poll of draft-dhody-pce-iana-update
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3CapqpY3w5GV0GszmElk1K-W09M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

We have clear support and no objection on adopting this small I-D: it is 
now a PCE WG item.

@Authors: please re-submit the draft as draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-00.

@Authors of draft-farrel-pce-experimental-errors: please talk to the 
authors of the aforementioned I-D to consider adding your proposal as a 
contribution into this new WG effort.

Thank you,

Julien


Le 30/07/2024 à 10:36, julien.meuric@orange.com a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> In his review of the "native IP" draft, John suggested to consider 
> adjusting to "IETF Review" the allocation policy of some of the PCEP 
> registries currently using "Standards Action". Dhruv has submitted 
> draft-dhody-pce-iana-update to quickly resolve this concern and bring 
> higher consistency among PCEP registries.
>
> As a result, does the WG support the adoption of 
> draft-dhody-pce-iana-update [1] as a WG item? Please, share your 
> feedback using the PCE mailing list and include your rationale in case 
> you're opposed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julien
>
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iana-update/

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status