[Pce] Apologies to PCE WG [Was: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations]

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 24 February 2017 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9F512944F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:48:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgeTrNn8Z_ym for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F279129444 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1OHm92l024283 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:48:09 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([176.241.250.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1OHlx4s024217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:48:06 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: pce@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:47:59 -0000
Message-ID: <093201d28ec6$29107960$7b316c20$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdKOxiIonb0oilDaRm6m40zRVmIQpg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.1.0.1062-22906.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.808-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.808-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: PRu4IS+PuGqLYNCgks6kChes/RxhysDbF0R6C/1uGOqhUoducQu06clO 14E7OluCMGrGEXAZeWZXqxadOdAiph6P3S7DTddXACs2C3nGlBhu/Xr6CKXiN7VhTD1Udgq8D/9 DjBV+GR6xeJnhTDPBHEVCLfvT6OQhRqbusTlqmWvx5KZMlKYS/VHewY36PuY09CCgKMGOOTZeCT ywAvRi0fOAo/IHU4uTiLeNsIRG8q1ccQ8eam5EfTl/1fD/Gopd2K+lN2ZUJHbEQdG7H66TyMdRT 5TQAJnA24JneUmxqoBeiOVIujz04qbXJVGDU4nFapv/5LdmStmeqD9WtJkSIw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3d36LhsND58Yw1LlVg_5GOysoEg>
Subject: [Pce] Apologies to PCE WG [Was: TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations]
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:48:13 -0000

Hi PCE WG,

I feel I owe an apology as an active member who has come up with a "strong"
review during IETF last call.

Truth is I had basically ignored this draft from way back because I did not
think it was "mainstream". I can see the value espoused in the motivation
sections, and I don't object to the function, but I also did not think it would
end up playing a significant role in deployments, so I neglected to read the
text (ever!).

Then I got selected as the TSV-ART reviewer and, of course, read the document.

The short form of my review is:
- the motivations are credible
- the solution is basically functional
- the documentation of the details needs attention

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 24 February 2017 17:42
> To: tsv-ads@ietf.org
> Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-
> optimizations@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] TSV-ART review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations
> Reviewer: Adrian Farrel
> Review Date: February 21, 2017
> IETF LC End Date: February 28, 2017
> IESG Telechat date: March 16, 2017
> 
> Review result: Has Issues