IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Wed, 18 September 2024 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4993C15153F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QqNgHFNnIROn for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B20C14F71D for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4X7sGT4Zcnz4xth3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:27:45 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4X7sFr1vwPz501bt; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:27:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app02.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.116]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 48I8R5Ig077746; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:27:05 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app06[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:27:08 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:27:08 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afe66ea8edcffffffffc96-53df6
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240918162708387HfBuB7GL1UVMO249BYmbA@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: julien.meuric@orange.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 48I8R5Ig077746
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 66EA8F01.000/4X7sGT4Zcnz4xth3
Message-ID-Hash: 6IMSOI3ASYNCDGXKJXP2MEZ6TTJ2RG6T
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6IMSOI3ASYNCDGXKJXP2MEZ6TTJ2RG6T
X-MailFrom: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3dkr74ec9DJ6Xnj_s_zKG24jPpk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Julien and PCE WG,

Thanks for the useful and meaningful work!  I support the progress of this document. 
I am a liitle confused that why RFC9357 is listed as informative references while other PCEP registries are listed as normative references. Thanks!

Best Regards,
Quan


<<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update
julien.meuric@orange.com Fri, 06 September 2024 12:24 UTCShow header
Hi all,

Since we have consensus, let's move forward with this simple fix to [1], 
as agreed with the IESG. This message starts a 2-week WG last call for 
draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 [2]. Please share your support or comments 
on the PCE mailing list by Friday September 20.

Thank you,

Julien


[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C519[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01
Attachment: smime.p7s

[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update  julien.meuric

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up…  Adrian Farrel

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up…  Dhruv Dhody

[Pce] 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up…  Aijun Wang

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up…  Andrew Stone (Nokia)

[Pce] Re: 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-ian…  Cheng Li

[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up…  Samuel Sidor (ssidor)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status