IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection

Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net> Mon, 29 April 2019 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rtorvi@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33CB120436; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.337
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.363, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VF1gs-lSeie1; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BBB3120025; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108156.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x3THYTfH029711; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=2XqDNiu5FYlwfJsx3gXmDIc3fsZhnt1vkM4X/12jnZA=; b=rZ22RLZX1wI2djYWRnJMAEgywt48js4QON3OyuZ2SpS6KfGmxW1hQsDgxkx20dkJDJyV gZdx6844EmjMBnF7fBepyCaeXU7JnfzCKjVM3OVouP7lzIl5pX/9veGt7TqpbTDDMKgg KfVODQwV0aNEIbJ/0OReFGrb4kx9ywoAyfvNdepgadPTal3o3dyKG9cFRxj+x5KZGZob nvKH2tuZpeP+WFqydxZ2g6Vwc8bhNBpS/IYgZvNg57MxWHNKgOx0z7J+78N6UciMwTQn puxAEexElZvsvs8FUw6DpJyIukHmBI+T84XTokSzAGuRZn9Jx7C1/6un3jv2UeWSWHvp ZA==
Received: from nam01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01lp2057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.57]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2s62syga6e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:38:32 -0700
Received: from SN6PR05MB5213.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.177.252.83) by SN6PR05MB3968.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.132.125.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1856.9; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:38:30 +0000
Received: from SN6PR05MB5213.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ddb1:4301:7dea:eb77]) by SN6PR05MB5213.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::ddb1:4301:7dea:eb77%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1856.008; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:38:30 +0000
From: Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>
To: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>, "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org>
CC: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection
Thread-Index: AQHU70knor+f03Uov0yE0lZBGxbZnaZTQxOA
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:38:29 +0000
Message-ID: <2D457AD9-888A-4648-ABE6-ACEFC43ED797@juniper.net>
References: <CAL70W4qf+Aw-CfQ7ga54aBHKyn+qcNCrue5Zy-sEacNf=8YmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL70W4qf+Aw-CfQ7ga54aBHKyn+qcNCrue5Zy-sEacNf=8YmLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.18.0.190414
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9d0ca01e-4726-4d77-6752-08d6ccc97e6d
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR05MB3968;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR05MB3968:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR05MB3968177699B4E4517B4C262CD0390@SN6PR05MB3968.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0022134A87
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(136003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(478600001)(25786009)(6436002)(6486002)(26005)(76176011)(99286004)(14454004)(186003)(6506007)(33656002)(6246003)(53936002)(68736007)(102836004)(11346002)(53546011)(6512007)(446003)(486006)(476003)(54896002)(6306002)(229853002)(2616005)(5660300002)(2501003)(4326008)(81156014)(2906002)(36756003)(81166006)(8936002)(82746002)(8676002)(7736002)(97736004)(86362001)(6116002)(3846002)(66446008)(73956011)(316002)(256004)(14444005)(83716004)(71190400001)(66476007)(110136005)(66066001)(76116006)(91956017)(66946007)(66556008)(64756008)(58126008)(71200400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR05MB3968; H:SN6PR05MB5213.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: a5UkvMyOli9MKvICpRwbsb5BY44wyfrMUSsIVIdeuDUxx3BMjyaT3kp5HIkOUWLUg09IRnIk95RmXtDKFrCUztxjKGsAC3KnUqraZjfZPW6YX01cnuFSMi2Iz6lZULqzXdtYIwA7UV5VJxwe4H+9YUUKIV1K53KOfTQ3aEWsIw0r9zQauoHE4qZSJmeTx3f24+hvsnPFwM0aJJ46Y1/KNqM4RmPhqUbrdl9uu2QgSGW4CROXbSqLr/gBXSBTLuNMoDrEHk6LY5WTE8XJwT+4VMxIniNyJrzGyuRvQrSn0kVtx/hCd6IqvWr5IlJyTCjg0YhpOsAEhPMMAr+AupCXeC+aifJuAB/uAHN2yWopnwe7erpehfWPpilm8afHo5RA8Gi/0CNO/aB98cfLb5ydE5eeIuQjBvyhISBXysM2uu8=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2D457AD9888A4648ABE6ACEFC43ED797junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9d0ca01e-4726-4d77-6752-08d6ccc97e6d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Apr 2019 17:38:29.9406 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR05MB3968
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-04-29_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1904290120
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3glv08LHGG9i_3WQTAZkXfNy6FI>
Subject: Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:38:35 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Regards,
Ravi

From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 10:57 PM
To: "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: <hari@netflix.com>, <msiva@cisco.com>, <rtorvi@juniper.net>, <inaminei@google.com>, <edward.crabbe@gmail.com>, <mahendrasingh@huawei.com>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 at 10:57 PM


Hi authors,



In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.



Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:



I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email