[Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 29 August 2017 02:48 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org, Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com, pce@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150397488548.13263.5782301568612117726.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 19:48:05 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4F8nzOB2xrcswdcTWApA4LHn3-w>
Subject: [Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is section 2 expected to be of more than background interest to an implementer?
If not, I suggest moving it to an appendix, or at least towards the back of the
document.

[Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-p… Ben Campbell
Re: [Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Dhruv Dhody
Re: [Pce] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell