[Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com> Fri, 18 December 2020 22:12 UTC
Return-Path: <hari@netflix.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182903A0A0E for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:12:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netflix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzEDms4GTxKR for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:11:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237633A0A08 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:11:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id q5so3545081ilc.10 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:11:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netflix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z/Fy8Uv12xWZ0KiguDRz3thbdCjkrFvVn6++VzrxrHs=; b=XfNVir4sHQph5+Rkq1fAXyNRIZdf/WrMK66DlQWjq/iOGbro7H5t8zKzOJqf5G8Iv8 D27/1GMm/IhS/LihqvDzXM6GPSwwpsSrBXuqUJnnzx8thBy9Qt3iAFh1ECBrV2EIX4Fi klMl/Zcpw1uBVo0hIPvnbw7/PP5oh+9E4pC7I=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z/Fy8Uv12xWZ0KiguDRz3thbdCjkrFvVn6++VzrxrHs=; b=pMUteE+EluNa+FPV9cqG/4j2ZeKRfw5p86qxQFrjqQWxdJ5iNwQrW52MCnNCmDCRzm n+x70pq8LJLhFiyL6Xy7Tr8a3/DWir0R20D6tXs21Mvobn8jaSNGdSTeqK7emtWqUBSY WiffqhilrkoSdgv9fRfBPjYiuc3JoEgYpYbOmTRCY1E1RsZYOW2ckcP+W0+gePXeSGyC 7PlXIYE3wzZvpmnLmGJ0yK6V3yG2SB0VyMBz6T7QXpvAfF4KXYYT4i316+vzVHah0hbL A29Cg85Ct+iLllhIw2wNdUAuNIH3Mgtkb/WLrhoRJqiZmyl0UeF6q7FIiWoJSQlrAPaY LVGw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JsmYsaGUY5hk36buBv3k9mhMLZP7Bn0WYRuxQNmni30M2hPDD grgPfc9Qh1yNvTYwaJlLJ+hUtuWrgdsaEgklRmu4Ng==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIRtItNH8RBT0xwkMKFuRWjqTeZ5YlnlCHaaJFB2uj5WSOu6DcyaTnmQlZ8NjLefCez2K3S8ZnxDYYTWUGl/E=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:6706:: with SMTP id b6mr6517921ilc.121.1608329518074; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:11:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:11:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL70W4pahNiEPFR=Qy6CTvQDUuwiyN99k7H-Bmcc1yf_LeosaA@mail.gmail.com>
To: olivier.dugeon@orange-ftgroup.com, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, younglee.tx@gmail.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b7d5405b6c465e2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4a7lMJYkdTokMcSJFvCShyZUOXY>
Subject: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 22:12:00 -0000
Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Thanks, - Hari
- [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-inter… Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-i… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-i… Young Lee
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-i… julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-i… olivier.dugeon