[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

julien.meuric@orange.com Thu, 18 March 2021 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0853A2834; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 04:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.191
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUiDRN6QdJ7X; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 04:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 614BF3A2833; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 04:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by opfedar21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4F1PQy1cfJz7ttk; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:08:42 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1616065722; bh=HxJyo82QIKtCMpf7CZks1QqYuV6V6LkOHMSjxBLci7s=; h=From:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pC8yHplUngV1DsSYPPPUl9N/RLNPkWgbs5YAXCNlNhIQmKAjYRhf2WbmSTfw2yLo5 lHEZ1EAR4sKghBwW0Vy0bhjguFVEFSGgI+xVbnsUxXn0CtYo4VbbykNSzZ+gQFdbhf sKv0If4VsNX2AifCKA2KzFlLKVsCEJfMfi/70WTZNLvbYP/vqjMj6AwewBBat7WYXu Xl3WHDreE4MMGGbcANxTOqj2vw79sqRNDDkQeKpRnCENIrzwJ/jtHViCYUYJ0RhECf Ucpa4XcgBoxRXizzpIHkM2/MjhRRoQmtU5Hd8XqXLhtlalMsb1UsJVoYg1PyPeNVmr lrogBJ8EHWBug==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.29]) by opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4F1PQy0jYRzCqkj; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:08:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.192.150.121] (10.114.13.247) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:08:41 +0100
From: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: <draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <7010_1616065722_605334BA_7010_19_1_3f1d8d24-af98-f962-95ea-0e6ec46b738c@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:08:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.247]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/4fAIsaSyFYJStT3o4sme32yA_Ro>
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:08:51 -0000

Hi all,

This message initiates a 2-week PCE WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07. Please review and share your
feedback, whatever it is, using the PCE mailing list. This WGLC will end
on Thursday April 1st (no kidding).


Moreover, we have received a request from the authors for a code point
allocation to support interoperability testing.

RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:

b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
(henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
in an Internet-Draft.
c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.

If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or
believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other
reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining why. If
the chairs hear no objections by Thursday, March 25th, we will kick off
the "early" allocation request.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.