IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt

<daniel@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 17 June 2019 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5507120154 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OPHJOghHhqfB for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F32B12004D for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id c66so1034153wmf.0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:02:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=rInavjbJXtn+AneT0nTGM61wsLf2rZu+MQFlYHnDspg=; b=CW2vbIaQ+bxmLBeuazx5Mlqj3Qro5I1cVknEmTyBg2ovOwp5TvDGyn6Z8gsVBondZw dkXX5qF6Cbv6SP10PgtQ5wc4TuqyqdFRkpgxLHaMrP+dVurUrpVUn/Wjz1yT3P5pj6D5 inAw+YE/gfD6SaS9wPKLDMmYT37kfDjqXpFeMVqLlJhRtTzAtK3dgywpwLsjns2Ryhws /SnCg0O1E4V2yhu+ePEXRrn1faxIGDIUxgUAwJhJUks78cV34Yuf1XXWJgWD4G52VttI ZJiZmkyEUY4VDYtF5gvV3BlvAjVRx+YQ+9793WzQ2ajwtvDpHkAz22u5F85fHFt5tEGw W7vg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=rInavjbJXtn+AneT0nTGM61wsLf2rZu+MQFlYHnDspg=; b=uSsvrPBn1lMIyPf9mQ/jQW+dNOslXOyp19DqUwwYhChC+CoPHMzeMBtDgLI30cU7vD mzgxxVKHMehn+1F8eCPnGNo7PfXJ7ZrBEOJCQynAnFkGlksnSXVgk6JWqnQiCavBXPss J15Qi1WQYgI3GA7kmU3R1e+A4Lneur1DSOxXYauDrYqXDkbzRAp8v3I2KSzWrpHeAREp ycR6uoUsfzlp3NePQNYUD2uDQXrIQ0C2FEklGRgHPiWurS7QrYnlLso7zubpyYS5W1IW b0AGsJD5YgBE8vGbE/SbdEFOD0vnNqys5WINWCsKQU7U1e8JzcxUBUuZNWATG1adbsac JxKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVKTmHBRA0Iw4+GL1+G9vY14L9A5rnqG4xuzAGx9HhjA3JW9+X5 +ntsm4CuhRupsjofHajf02pyz9alGZwI9Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfEXxttI4lBCq+h2tt7N7AFGyULYfv3fuMcJylhfZWBkfh+VfQP7Wx6iB+oGZwOqStvwh0fA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f21a:: with SMTP id s26mr456787wmc.163.1560808972696; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CIPHER (host86-157-191-178.range86-157.btcentralplus.com. [86.157.191.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y184sm439563wmg.14.2019.06.17.15.02.51 for <pce@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: "Daniel King" <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: pce@ietf.org
References: <156080870226.22474.8459005932219518482@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156080870226.22474.8459005932219518482@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 23:02:51 +0100
Message-ID: <00b301d52558$6870f280$3952d780$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQG5oAjrbLCEWHE0VKrgEM/efwJ2GabXcFAw
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/5fLbi99OOVWZEiTI0_TtD25JVtQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:02:58 -0000

Hi All, 

This revision of the I-D adjusts the number of document authors, from six to
five. 

BR, Dan. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 17 June 2019 22:58
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Hierarchical Stateful Path Computation Element
(PCE).
        Authors         : Dhruv Dhody
                          Young Lee
                          Daniele Ceccarelli
                          Jongyoon Shin
                          Daniel King
	Filename        : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10.txt
	Pages           : 21
	Date            : 2019-06-17

Abstract:
   A Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information on
   the current network state, including: computed Label Switched Path
   (LSPs), reserved resources within the network, and pending path
   computation requests. This information may then be considered when
   computing new traffic engineered LSPs, and for associated and
   dependent LSPs, received from Path Computation Clients (PCCs). The
   Path computation response from a PCE is helpful for the PCC to
   gracefully establish the computed LSP.

   The Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) architecture,
   provides an architecture to allow the optimum sequence of
   inter-connected domains to be selected, and network policy to be
   applied if applicable, via the use of a hierarchical relationship
   between PCEs.

   Combining the capabilities of Stateful PCE and the Hierarchical PCE
   would be advantageous. This document describes general considerations
   and use cases for the deployment of Stateful, and not Stateless, PCEs
   using the Hierarchical PCE architecture.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-10


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email