[Pce] Regarding IRO Update/Survey & Domain-Sequence

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 October 2014 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1241A9060 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYTP8TOoZ61D for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70831A9064 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id y20so847112ier.12 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0I3aFq/3nBvub4YvtCkq6uPF5hMIsCBAMIdpy8dh/a4=; b=LUppLgxEs3By2lhDn3l9qX74iwcxMfFS/oSkV1r/Nv8jz8WAf5gzjMJnScebmapCir 7hNMBxJ8p1zcQNgzaPAN4lj/xP2h+XZBN5lVDqSuXiGjxkSysBQQhQkgLR+sdkL0soMa zXOhjytq6kXUBJBSHQ1rZZ/Qef4L8mtlfzEPPjYv1V/8mxzx9SunXWIXsc0RaPMOUa0/ QNlAbmknpnOi6P4H2inFbT4u5b3OP4yCTyPPY3DZLAakU5j3b+MQj+hST8vEmffEehFm 9eWh5H81kNwazBbIpFYfK9oxIN/N0rgousw/K+aHGtHgX+J8AJljEM2zed/8cAeQymoc ZYhQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.5.72 with SMTP id 8mr9897653icv.27.1414068179250; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
X-Google-Sender-Delegation: dhruvdhody@gmail.com
Received: by 10.50.252.42 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 18:12:59 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5Z3h6P8ItP3RNSiEwasDzCFo-Bk
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4uNYbc4goOsDt08W82V9zAf1D6zVN7ZkNT=TkMA=QqAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/5y_PLFUQQw41Q10jRsiCuwvamGo
Subject: [Pce] Regarding IRO Update/Survey & Domain-Sequence
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:43:09 -0000

WG,

(1) IRO Specification Update:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-iro-update-00

This document updates RFC5440 IRO Specification making IRO as an
ordered list as well as support for loose bit (L-bit) based on the IRO
Survey conclusion.

Abstract:
   During discussions of a document to provide a standard representation
   and encoding of Domain-Sequence within the Path Computation Element
   (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) for communications between a Path
   Computation Client (PCC) and a PCE, or between two PCEs.  It was
   determined that there was a need for clarification with respect to
   the ordered nature of the Include Route Object (IRO).

   An informal survey was conducted to determine the state of current
   and planned implementation with respect to IRO ordering and handling
   of Loose bit.

   This document updates the IRO specification based on the survey
   conclusion and recommendation.

(2) IRO Survey:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey-01
Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey-01

- updated with the reference to above document.

(3) Domain Sequence
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-06
Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-06

- removed IRO options and comparison
- uses updated IRO specification

Any feedback on the set of documents are most welcome.
Hoping we can make progress on these document quickly.

Regards,
Dhruv