[Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-09: (with COMMENT)
Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 30 September 2019 09:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D80120142; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 02:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org, Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <hari@netflix.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, hari@netflix.com, pce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.103.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <156983718180.546.10162334928586461765.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 02:53:01 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6cf-dS39T5Kqu_Ux33iyuPqkPXw>
Subject: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 09:53:02 -0000
Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, thank you for this document. This document indicates: "...MUST NOT trigger the error condition for unknown PLSP-ID in an LSP update request as per [RFC8231] ...". "...MUST NOT trigger the error handling as specified in [RFC8231] ...". Yet, it also says: The procedures for granting and relinquishing control of the LSPs are specified in accordance with the specification [RFC8231]. So 1/ it seems to me that the latter sentence, considering the first two, is not strictly correct. 2/ the rationale is well described, so I'm fine with not respecting the original rules of 8231, but then I wonder if this document shouldn't update 8231.
- [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ie… Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Dhruv Dhody