Re: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 16 November 2016 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEDE1297CF; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQAJKh0FOR2K; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (asmtp4.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF25912953D; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:56:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp4.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAGDudPH031915; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:56:39 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([58.120.104.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp4.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAGDuY7d031879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:56:37 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Jonathan Hardwick' <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org
References: <06f201d23fdf$e06bbe20$a1433a60$@olddog.co.uk> <BY2PR0201MB1910CFCAE76C16702745CB8984BE0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR0201MB1910CFCAE76C16702745CB8984BE0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:56:29 -0000
Message-ID: <076301d24011$4006b9d0$c0142d70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHkPeLtN8fGnZfi2ri3U098tzBuVQH/zyLdoKdxU4A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22702.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.079-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--18.079-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: scwq2vQP8OHRhEyb9f1sjk0IfQOJvRLRwx0jRRxcQfOObf10apLcScLm p4jPUF8tRFsqph676uCU+xfB5OHYy/Ue3cF58v23StpI+4+KLgA+ooVNjt38kWtEzrC9eANp9Ae 1UPqORDrUr8pZ+ygb1b4bOTEqgJ/8eJ1d43FMKpRIRA38P/dwbgOocmryPTnw0mAM2eipqloONn COtDoJBZ6Ss6O2bihGHDnwvr6B+jQYB2fOueQzjzl/1fD/GopdyJ1gFgOMhOn6APa9i04WGCq2r l3dzGQ1A/3R8k/14e0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6fGj3U8OoEICHcqE1SV4yRQiCbs>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:56:44 -0000

Aha, good.

So just that draft-raghu... should ask for a new flag from the to-be-created
registry.

Thanks.
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com]
> Sent: 16 November 2016 10:02
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org
> Cc: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags
> 
> Hi Adrian
> 
> draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp defines the R flag and requests IANA to
create the
> registry in section 8.3.  Registries cannot be created during IANA early
allocation,
> so we need to wait for this draft to be published.  (As an aside, I believe
that
> IANA are considering changing that policy down the line.)
> 
> Cheers
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 16 November 2016 17:03
> To: draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org
> Cc: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Just reading your I-D during the meeting (sorry, but better now than never :-)
> 
> I think we need a registry for the flags in the SRP registry.
> 
> Maybe that should be in draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce? But it could also be in
your
> document.
> 
> And if we need evidence that this is needed, your figure 1 shows the 'R' flag,
but
> there is no mention of it in the text, so I assume you have seen it in some
other
> document.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce