Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C5D12010F; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:41:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evypOkpetaRA; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:40:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E30D12010E; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:40:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id q8so6974164ljj.11; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:40:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zMVlAVhOybR8oTooOTJcVTypBFJkW/D+w9AiSwAHd3E=; b=EIAkubSmKl4BJWstd78bCjbUlJsMNgRydvJCDm658u+5bIpo4G4fc/ko6i4+oYndEi fyCQe5Q43dvqZYUmZ0A/RR/ldNugVQ84SXMO5Y5aiFUGpwSBICndJLbtpFV8CrHqAQd2 rffTa5poaY/f9FLE0KzXfbS0+1oDC6kMIxzaVYck/QXL1jRXcHGIRLRMv+dxtcF0tITe UL0G0hJSus2/LXWnymdlf1faqW3/taThRFGBVsEROt8/E9ypflvIwADR5nsf0dTct+R6 fzwbLyZUCptgNcsd7UOO1FMM3Ve2xp1VdloL5/mw3M+xf35nDXaYY3ARmfwLiihIl6hR 67Qw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zMVlAVhOybR8oTooOTJcVTypBFJkW/D+w9AiSwAHd3E=; b=AAlY8hiYWc7sfJ9MBHDePsN2rrGUjSe8QL9MlAdP17LnyHGOWlWjMI2bQ1IWRRGID1 yKRGJPJk8QAtQGHmI2pE+b7+4oKdG5Z35Bstzr9HA0L9SZA5hk0AQMmjejpu3mURsKUf Qr3cR9e5bLwPL802Hzi0PpTpqJHLhuag9Uui8ceP9YYNy9quhLblvtGdSEeTLO6iJtBR udybomg8MfRDoJhX5T/KJ7GKcZUUWhWQZ3HvmdpYoG3iiQD7BcmdDFNRIwPKZCaOr//X w6xnTo3BgyDicQUAyQPbRtXNr5gLSeYcw5Ygv066JIVltGfaaRJDg5PsAuABNyGdOrRh sy1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2LK6ywr9yfl2vk8Qge591QyS9Oa43vk+wbVgXdqmQUxSeM8jp pPf5ylJpGDcHKoXtc4WCLoFzm/MXVA8Mpx4udw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxGd2voCuqgMoe7s9Pxn+MxXhVOCgsOeHrjVjAEI7aLibL+oFUTAvgG95F+wgZA5PLzew6f3wPxULFbuBRFdEs=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9744:: with SMTP id f4mr2829246ljj.267.1581010855459; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:40:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e69cdba1-69c2-583c-3eaf-f14265a45d74@orange.com> <819569dd-0dd9-8980-2235-a2a8e6b70e83@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <819569dd-0dd9-8980-2235-a2a8e6b70e83@orange.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:40:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6f3gGf-+n6po_xtR+sXom+njhPMxf8sJYNsB1Wws8aiMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org, draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cfda7059debc6d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/6wzm9zEVDwIxW3ViEwFZZ07gN0s>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 17:41:00 -0000

Hi Julien,
We have posted a revised draft 07 to address the comment on the author
list.
We plan to address the remained comments in the adopted revision.
Please let us know if ok to post draft-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-00.

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-07
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-07

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-07

Thanks,
Rakesh (behalf of authors)



On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 4:09 PM <julien.meuric@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This I-D has enough support to be adopted.
>
> Before we proceed, we'd like to see an update addressing at least the
> issue about the number of names on the front page. Authors, please
> submit a -07 version accordingly, so that we can move the draft forward.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dhruv & Julien
>
>
> On 17/01/2020 11:12, julien.meuric@orange.com wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
> > Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
> > use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
> > disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dhruv & Julien
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>