[Pce] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 16 March 2017 12:52 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com, pce@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148966877379.14173.10795540658437667166.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 05:52:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/7Ca0ZfD1XbRuHQ8v0s92szcQed0>
Subject: [Pce] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I generally agree with the secdir review.

TCP/AO is sadly fictional, so please don't
let's pretend it's usable to help here. Just
recommend TLS. (And add BCP195 too please.)

[Pce] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-iet… Stephen Farrell