Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

julien.meuric@orange.com Tue, 05 May 2020 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23823A095A for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 09:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fcwp1cZ9RI2o for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB293A093F for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 09:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) by opfednr24.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 49Glm00zvqz1yl8; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1588696720; bh=L/SkvmymrtYgFEaROdnaX/YixbecqOdCLoc9tpNz8Gw=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=aMJ19QRN9mvHsfedOO6rqqdP1BW91pMTrswE5Eph416S4gcECqVAElXkG9YCro40N LLpaWQmTB1VB/B6khIqRgY8fhBnWY/eJRPT0vPW2KgxvuM9Jfw3MbgCfPQMI5eCeAm uQbx8q95g1xn7OCiEfLZUV+qINtuQA6ZNUjPFDDThL61nN/jx0Z2GWk1uOLZfODl9s 705FAbjekJWghchE5p3VF2lZKnzA/lLFm/NEx9Vs3h+oOSdYb/6xw0IJlDvI1tTqUy uLrZScuzhgUtjC6rbXnuNUvp5ht/GY8KMr73EssYWZ8F/62cgkek3+9MYkd1YUjsXl gPG4PYtonOaPQ==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.73]) by opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 49Glm0033kz8sYH; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.192.150.153] (10.114.13.245) by exchange-eme6.itn.ftgroup (10.114.13.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:38:39 +0200
To: <pce@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn6kVzAf8f95q1gtBvGV6qbw_7vbiYz+XUJjKxX20QU4Uw@mail.gmail.com>
From: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <29155_1588696720_5EB19690_29155_323_1_5e1d0f4c-7d61-ec7f-1252-7a0bc87fb85f@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 18:38:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn6kVzAf8f95q1gtBvGV6qbw_7vbiYz+XUJjKxX20QU4Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: [10.114.13.245]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/7usW8HGZXLb520xWnS5_m_-4k_Q>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Early code point allocation for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 16:38:44 -0000

Hi all,

As we have not received any objection, we consider that we have a
consensus on this early codepoint allocation. We are thus going to
proceed with the request.

Cheers,

Dhruv & Julien


On 22/04/2020 19:07, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> We have received a request from the authors of
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy for an early code point allocation.
>
> RFC 7120 requires to meet the following criteria to proceed:
>
>    b.  The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to
>        handling the protocol entities defined by the code points
>        (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described
>        in an Internet-Draft.
>    c.  The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if
>        there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later
>        specifications must be seamlessly interoperable.
>
> If anyone believes that the draft does not meet these criteria, or
> believes that early allocation is not appropriate for any other
> reason, please send an email to the PCE mailing list explaining the
> reasons.  If the chairs hear no objections by next Friday, May 1st, we
> will kick off the early allocation request.
>
> Best regards and stay safe,
>
> Dhruv & Julien
>


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.