[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

"Aijun Wang" <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Mon, 02 September 2019 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BB512011D; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sk8MsaXUC_N; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (m176115.mail.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9854F120118; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WangajPC (unknown [219.142.69.77]) by m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 9B52B6627B0; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 16:50:05 +0800 (CST)
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'pce-chairs' <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn44Q8Y_eeGDfV+ecojJt0gKd9zHU4B7V0Xn_PYneCQAeg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn44Q8Y_eeGDfV+ecojJt0gKd9zHU4B7V0Xn_PYneCQAeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 16:50:06 +0800
Message-ID: <014901d5616b$6b906dc0$42b14940$@org.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdVXfw+CfKqeBlUsQKWQmLYTKeoM2gJ6/oxg
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgYFAkeWUFZVktVSEpCQkJCTE5PT0lDQ01PWVdZKF lBSkxLS0o3V1ktWUFJV1kJDhceCFlBWTU0KTY6NyQpLjc#WQY+
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6NSI6CBw4MTlLIyI#E00VShxP PBwaFANVSlVKTk1MT0pPSUpLQkhOVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlJSkJVSk9JVU1CVUxMWVdZCAFZQUlMS0g3Bg++
X-HM-Tid: 0a6cf12abd279373kuws9b52b6627b0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/8hYst-WyWEO-brgIXJO38VdQXpg>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:50:16 -0000

Yes/Support.

I think such mechanism is necessary for the interoperation of SR and
RSVP-TE, and can overcome some shortcomings of SR technology.

Aijun Wang.

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2019年8月21日 1:45
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 [1].

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/ Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing
to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

One of the chairs did a pre-adoption review [2] and authors posted a new
revision. Note that there are known implementations.

This adoption poll will end on 6th September 2019.

Thanks!
Dhruv (for the chairs)


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oaBIRA9FnNsV6-JrKKRCdwtLysk

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce