IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2019 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA40120145; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0cUzAmvDHoX; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 189F01200FA; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id p23so14559765iol.13; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 11:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VsIHJzGuGAIvNjkVoAY/WeEeqWC+jKCzWbJEiWSYRe8=; b=PrVCYxX9Jwtb/HENTKZORNVijEHlfRbRGYJ4W/3THk6kgk2FDelj0nlgN+IPF5qDnB 5lz7mKjv19z+eSFGbAqW7AjXICi9HzRpRsxb9BB6RaDw5jG74wn+UqVf3qf/bG9T1x6T YgY5mUEp59anZkE808UInhpaiFxqLLq85L9QMd4OOtqLvjWGcCfdy4R11edhu0hCfTtK 9HSFPOKa2rLptcbMAauJyVhqwoXVXhMiYWWgvKijCW8nuAizKmIM+V0T7IgXOjcuY9ew zTv0YZko2hiMJ9yUKWTcECDdsSab4CSlfiJ2zhIiwgyInX2t8hZbT/1J38lmhtB7sudU khaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VsIHJzGuGAIvNjkVoAY/WeEeqWC+jKCzWbJEiWSYRe8=; b=A4P8iPzcAlXEBAsMACZBw/YRmoZBo7BxHu4DE94w1QBh9+VjDSWT/RJXKaOY5cTqbc cW666CrNEOKQ2MjMHbnqqo/R0vo19VW27AHkliyBaL/wLx6C7mVT2JrlGEj0TTDUoGhs V/oAvsMROvkErBUM13CQW7zbtNXHILCk7wMIRa6xkPkCq+fJRnSLnWXNkFnAKj5cCJWW NsdfgYDJmjEl3ImPMh+WdVndDm0MmKszSBBXHlejbCG45+H48AqtMSB27n3abq+4fQIX sSvE9SrCX4exbiyPGz0jVNVB+YzsGgAvZ8l8Rib1beWprDvF0rapSOxkWaR4gz/ZgF2q i2RQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7phIgdLBZFjF8FH1L3Atz6i5HRBVvjP9Sc4iYI+zkAfn8/qSt pLvrat3KP6+POJjJCtldiJ/6f3E7SxQD1/zPhFk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAqwziiKnoxrLsCdzNtV7eZPe7b83nlPmgdTE60qDTq8HPY9kIC54ulKXhDPtHiqz9/B9R9CGgEy8DaE+3E2M=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8b55:: with SMTP id c21mr24414807iot.188.1554834231168; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 11:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155483327430.19630.5640428050752441340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155483327430.19630.5640428050752441340.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 23:53:13 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn61HAmme0ORp=PuCQ0G7wPVE4RAwP=Lt46GD-FG6Yd0ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/9TB9hCrR7-R-hfITySyMJVoUpBQ>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 18:23:54 -0000

Hi Suresh,

Thanks for your review!

On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:37 PM Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
<noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-p2mp/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * Section 7.2.
>
> "The special value of all zeros for this TLV is used to refer to all paths
> pertaining to a particular PLSP-ID."
>
> Can you clarify what fields are all zero? What would the length be?
>
>

All fields of the value portion of the TLV are set to zero. The TLVs
has a fixed length of 16 and 40 for IPv4 and IPv6 respectively.
RFC8231 (section 7.3.1) also uses similar language for the TLV defined
there. Do you see a need to update text and be explicit?

Thanks!
Dhruv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email