IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-10

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 06 April 2019 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC80120026; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 05:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rkp7FjpHLkVa; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 05:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x133.google.com (mail-it1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C083F12008C; Sat, 6 Apr 2019 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x133.google.com with SMTP id v8so13064807itf.0; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fWWOmk16zmIYaFUYDyATSC/ovO3oXu2JqKCnC6xiD5Q=; b=hQYcjew9M2AzI7+cne4n8TXDTKvdHUzNEQf7H2xsu8u5Q0iKHGHi00s/2uFSkmz7tK KQgQ3/AYjeLqOFlB7Pb+QhZvnoAKJS4AjRRBQ7ksTRh9fg7/bzFjDCb7ZXQZ6WoPSIOj IsRh5vi4nXzp1WdpLmwIavGmOQJ6cd68vsGG67aVpQZqqZiSZ6vYRaK28QQP16XnH4P7 Xts2wqEXeE8diedgRkZTpPozJmpzXA+2/iDVuJWexbygPYbvWCEirL8mynM1Guu/bFdD X1hNF2mIi4hODOH/B4Z7QPKndjV6//Fy0kurFvVLQk9vEFjEn1X3R4LiDHHzdfI8J2u3 0ciw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fWWOmk16zmIYaFUYDyATSC/ovO3oXu2JqKCnC6xiD5Q=; b=WW2qal2d36+9LfQOBs4BpOtUFoz6i8DXKzTnR1vw4Q7M62KBiFkqGFeMGx/G0pcOJl y2JZ4e4q2Yv9Pa9C7J2Es9nZ6XexTvD0l3LpIYHMOQkMQA8gzqMsxk9YAkgVX7M1lbbf w25zyoHQaLFw8yQnj0ULjycVaA9N3A4lMkSynTnLUt6V1yoGkLRD2472WXDmsk3mFfyb IDdLkVGFEvdnWO0qmdoECKolOdYdmCaIGXniWTs+xR0OnfhMLZIxVzuSPnOflaHYO6c3 ETK3eh91m8H9byNpzHH1F4H+9uxRl4eeKr+U0XdpaH1uTydylDGVZW4KNKetiqfsP7aB NUUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVMdrhHlZfnNQpWXyx1277OfbbebN2KZ1W3k3Sc3tK9lXeW2uXh YoegJBt+prEBnvt2fQlkPBi1VKp/FtOLsa7V4tQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8HFt6XOXAWeI3ux40Zqs0IDSzzoxlMHZrrQ1vjCw2881c/b4bjHbbC9fBXcvfDAF4RxkObkRvv4YZzJiWIUY=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:58c:: with SMTP id 134mr975961itl.103.1554555540001; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 05:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155414886827.17190.2656925435521918458@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155414886827.17190.2656925435521918458@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:28:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4v0pcWo8VrS7=+U7C6erY9ZCDAk7D8rv=noyzog9nC7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/9UyrUpYLIqTwJEghe4Sd4DyOGis>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-10
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 12:59:06 -0000

Hi Yingzhen,

Thanks for your review. I have done the fix.

Regarding your last comment -

> 5. page 14.
>      “In case PNC generates an abstract topology to the MDSC, the
>       PCInitiate/PCUpd messages from the MDSC to a PNC will contain a
>       path with abstract nodes and links.”
> Should it be  “from the MDSC to a PNC” or “from the MDSC to the PNC”?
>

"From the MDSC to a PNC" reads fine to me, as there are multiple PNCs
involved (one of many rule for the use of a/an)!

See diff - https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-11

Thanks!
Dhruv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email