[Pce] RFC 9604 on Carrying Binding Label/SID in PCE-Based Networks
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Fri, 16 August 2024 21:48 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (unknown [167.172.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F412EC15793B; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 461) id 588983B874; Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240816214807.588983B874@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 14:48:07 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: LGFNGKRDOZS75GKIH52GFQZ7LP3MY4K3
X-Message-ID-Hash: LGFNGKRDOZS75GKIH52GFQZ7LP3MY4K3
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Pce] RFC 9604 on Carrying Binding Label/SID in PCE-Based Networks
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ANTkrJlQUy9tngzIBL6UJvFVKFE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pce-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pce-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pce-leave@ietf.org>
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9604
Title: Carrying Binding Label/SID in PCE-Based Networks
Author: S. Sivabalan,
C. Filsfils,
J. Tantsura,
S. Previdi,
C. Li, Ed.
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: August 2024
Mailbox: msiva282@gmail.com,
cfilsfil@cisco.com,
jefftant.ietf@gmail.com,
stefano@previdi.net,
c.l@huawei.com
Pages: 19
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-16.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9604
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9604
In order to provide greater scalability, network confidentiality, and
service independence, Segment Routing (SR) utilizes a Binding Segment
Identifier (BSID), as described in RFC 8402. It is possible to
associate a BSID to an RSVP-TE-signaled Traffic Engineering (TE)
Label Switched Path (LSP) or an SR TE path. The BSID can be used by
an upstream node for steering traffic into the appropriate TE path to
enforce SR policies. This document specifies the concept of binding
value, which can be either an MPLS label or a Segment Identifier
(SID). It further specifies an extension to Path Computation Element
Communication Protocol (PCEP) for reporting the binding value by a
Path Computation Client (PCC) to the Path Computation Element (PCE)
to support PCE-based TE policies.
This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC