IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 23 January 2020 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602FF12082D for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:37:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DGj3eCttWMmO for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7253A120804 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id m26so3898852ljc.13 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:37:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fnXVvlpVWL4+OodCwYWjWP7FNpHE9elvW5hyaBIT+QI=; b=OEvhT4QUfhDPBoCM5XF2BRfTOXWQfwDHFSWRM35NTEbSVI5nPiiBoWMGfB3ONDbnjC 4I+0VUYwChxWVGw/cW6q7sARhF01Q3PTxKaFvadHlQbWSzp0cwtYj3crebAvX30/7lvO f5TR1kIVIpTbL4xHSWkr+eWAP+ycLYk97/UEp4kYe4A3xf/toofnoyXwCNzX6GDwsZ7t An1Nee25WpR3xQSaeipqPDpj9ZJUiOl5lGudp/PW4Y1C9BV2RlZOEtdANIyjGEpbf7O0 4FVU+QjP0HJpFEG0jVks+x7WnF3rbaMqTAIz1E/3au63jn1y52Y2OSAK4Nh6+dEegAqT tQYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fnXVvlpVWL4+OodCwYWjWP7FNpHE9elvW5hyaBIT+QI=; b=PdlfZf6lvi019vG9r/1GYMX/oQRfQ0ul9Ci5ZS76T7SO9n9fWwLxhrkHaPYhVFsWWr /ZUM7JtZAqK0d7RQ9Q8CvVjL9GbOh64u7oIXDGfaH2qWgbcK/SYkMHulU6V/95EhWGGR WVir0Fpw213QRzIzek2PDdchdts19jcqIoT1sJuC3SWGs4sa/0Ed2C56Gg0hV7fHG6cs pv1vUo0jrCIzFmh1GpLUw+btaJaBCcgQ/jDqtdAghpaxRXF4qw7ye9gmKuSGDPUDSkle 7qyA8gs50osKz5tA+O90uct0hB135HI6d+8PtMwP0BdyI4DHIiWKaTJYPQcbKWLurbZL q1vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXp4z/yoJg/Oqgr+30scDNSCi+r4kJY9h7McTq2m4aEZjyHsoFv 2B5TyDxPvl+S+3f2Sc+NNkl8uofQM0/omhP+g1vF6biwmQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwUqcuOs49tT0rQhvAtHz0tM3lrsUUjIUpngoUCfrJzhLyater+EtG39fnKvjTjua01tL32Dn44unSU3EKVGo=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:e12:: with SMTP id 18mr23382626ljo.123.1579793826743; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:37:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e69cdba1-69c2-583c-3eaf-f14265a45d74@orange.com> <2020012311514351840896@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2020012311514351840896@chinatelecom.cn>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:36:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6cmNW1Xi7--RS+OrXXa51AmOLOH2W4DwGphhf5Vaq01rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dc8cca059cd0695f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ASMIJN7ExueJ3c84VrU3OPIP8M4>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:37:10 -0000

Hi Huanan,
Thank you for your support.

Do you mean how bidirectional SR would work with path protection as in:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-11

If yes, both are complementary. We can add text to indicate so.

Thanks,
Rakesh


On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:53 PM chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn <
chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn> wrote:

> Hi WG,
>
>    Support the adption.
>    I have read the draft, it is ready to be a WG document.
>    The extensions to PCEP were clear and the procedures to setup
> bidirectional SR-LSP were given too.
>    One comment: If we need SR-LSP redundancy, how should we do at the bidirectional
> SR-LSP scenario?
>
> Best Regards,
> Huanan
>
> *From:* julien.meuric@orange.com
> *Date:* 2020-01-17 18:12
> *To:* pce@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
> Hi all,
>
> It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
> Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
> use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
> disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dhruv & Julien
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email