Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D14C151076 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:40:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eUfyL-d8f_3W for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4B0C14F695 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 48I8dwdv003614; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:39:58 +0100 Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CF74604B; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:39:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CC14604A; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:39:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:39:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 48I8dvqQ008059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:39:57 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: , , "'Dhruv Dhody'" References: <20240918162708387HfBuB7GL1UVMO249BYmbA@zte.com.cn> In-Reply-To: <20240918162708387HfBuB7GL1UVMO249BYmbA@zte.com.cn> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:39:59 +0100 Organization: Old Dog Consulting Message-ID: <023801db09a6$58b7e730$0a27b590$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0239_01DB09AE.BA7D3990" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQKLpLkttKygKzrAoFFKLcVY+LDh3bD8ArNA Content-Language: en-gb X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75 X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=20221128; bh=QozwIectV1NlJDb68jyhq XZEmWvlYtK2Wy+BqFWvxi8=; b=xJqsj77KSmBbjc7XHcFYLg/vCs1sfaNh9L7TD sip9FcR9rwIz62f6CZ7KGh/oQZ2n3Ml9WFkmeBHN6SERmFqg+oT8ENpRIb6aO72h U2I4chHI5LfckIqu2naWl+iDAYidtwSQdgmpR9oJbY4+yPad3M3ZnOUoxoRIwRTm BUGagPTsUUbzuickzME5gcvgqtWTybVDVc3hdsMFhl+zcKsorZ2oSZd3jn2U3YJX 5fwPQBbd4HUtXh2XNDCt9BDnaDrSttYlrfCwxJaZ7XAz4KJPPLclYrOkn2t3PCOO mtrlHoCMUmylWUg+OKZxjQKbzcqwWK6ZOPOgmpInyNBiWy1wA== X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28352.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No--36.549-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--36.549-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28352.003 X-TMASE-Result: 10--36.548600-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: /NerNv6mnwM7iuZ/mdYYtrlNLzKnFXx/ccl1UxnDq0sVmboLUBJNnI/K GlCzQr4eLsECUlEeDpoE7TRD/Y9CzxmyTBaqiJvcrvcsxx7tGYlPHHbGQ/IUk42rc3rXpVKc/By c/04iPniy8+2mTn1u4X1JIA4rhsZ/aBTWjXFXXd8OabErRKSRvVYMJR3dIrh2NgrHlLFndgbkL3 HHkcbj25/0X5WpCPYcX9knSHW8uXUiSMnphO25RY2cB1+t/hleoT+7K9IgTZcg839dkIFeJPHhc +ASMjBIkH5SHztM/HkTuwt1FVoaZ99WrDP4LKdpnSgPkvDdtOgSpKYPHUJnSpCJSqC8FQVQPA1q QZtQo2U5jS4V09dQzlICmG2RRehoTr+NIKkmb8+3+4EuI/5sjzgo8pDHL4T+C8E8ZCgtbqUNajX +8EXzxT4pt4Z7puj9RynTwl9ZYh5U4sxFq6igEVCd7VOgbE3otAOCwsfpNBRcYT6bz8hs7++zko obd8qB+NvkbVZMr0RB9I5g6XEpi6n/3nyhTdZwj+DosVyGG7dLMIHo/IE5gUPOwReFHgq3PbQC5 KNcQCVFLl5Fk0ov0dwWRN30KO5P96zh/xfk1aiYI2SdJezB/7QREYZm2yynRRa406V/Ywxm9r8R H3aUHRT78o6iLAAhnTqdU4w65WmbOwnwKxlhTitwWBGVoxmpNAFJ7mu7APeFsLSS5LpPF/uhT0r Gbmg1OwTo9ZXISSyeAiCmPx4NwGmRqNBHmBve1B0Hk1Q1KyI9euiYe3o8eF3oPrpDIGnaKzfM9B 6IRt7+efAnnZBiLyF6bSSak9kx X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0 Message-ID-Hash: WGQCWBDRUKGD4KJHOPASSQJALGOLVJID X-Message-ID-Hash: WGQCWBDRUKGD4KJHOPASSQJALGOLVJID X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-pce.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BPce=5D_Re=3A_WG_Last_Call_for_draft-ietf-pce-iana-update?= List-Id: Path Computation Element Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0239_01DB09AE.BA7D3990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks, Quan. =20 You make a good point, I think. =20 Dhruv, if you have the pen, I see some smart quotes in the Abstract. =20 A =20 From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn =20 Sent: 18 September 2024 09:27 To: julien.meuric@orange.com Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update =20 =20 Hi Julien and PCE WG, =20 Thanks for the useful and meaningful work! I support the progress of = this document.=20 I am a liitle confused that why RFC9357 is listed as informative = references while other PCEP registries are listed as normative = references. Thanks! =20 Best Regards, Quan =20 =20 <<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update julien.meuric@orange.com Fri, 06 = September 2024 12:24 UTC = Show = header Hi all, =20 Since we have consensus, let's move forward with this simple fix to [1], = as agreed with the IESG. This message starts a 2-week WG last call for=20 draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 [2]. Please share your support or comments = on the PCE mailing list by Friday September 20. =20 Thank you, =20 Julien =20 =20 [1] = https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=3DC519[2] = = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 * Attachment: = smime.p7s * = = [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update julien.meuric * = = [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up=E2=80=A6 Adrian = Farrel * = = [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up=E2=80=A6 Dhruv Dhody * = = [Pce] =E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D: WG Last Call for = draft-ietf-pce-iana-up=E2=80=A6 Aijun Wang * = = [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up=E2=80=A6 Andrew Stone = (Nokia) * = = [Pce] Re: =E7=AD=94=E5=A4=8D: WG Last Call for = draft-ietf-pce-ian=E2=80=A6 Cheng Li * = = [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-up=E2=80=A6 Samuel Sidor = (ssidor) =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0239_01DB09AE.BA7D3990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks, = Quan.

 

You make a = good point, I think.

 

Dhruv, if = you have the pen, I see some smart quotes in the = Abstract.

 

A

 

From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn = <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
Sent: 18 September 2024 = 09:27
To: julien.meuric@orange.com
Cc: = pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Re: WG Last Call for = draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

 

 

Hi= Julien and PCE WG,

 

Thanks for = the useful and meaningful work!  I support the progress of this = document. 

I am a liitle confused that why RFC9357 = is listed as informative references while other PCEP registries are = listed as normative references. = Thanks!

 

Best = Regards,

Quan

 

 

<<[Pce] WG Last = Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

julien.meuric@orange.com Fri, 06 September = 2024 12:24 UTCShow = header

Hi all,
 
Since we have consensus, let's move forward with this simple =
fix to [1], 
as agreed with the IESG. This message starts a 2-week WG =
last call for 
draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 [2]. Please share your support =
or comments 
on the PCE mailing list by Friday September =
20.
 
Thank you,
 
Julien
 
 
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=3D=
C519[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-=
pce-iana-update-01

=C2=B7        = Attachment: smime.p7s<= /o:p>

 

<= /div> ------=_NextPart_000_0239_01DB09AE.BA7D3990--