[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04.txt

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 10 March 2016 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43FE812D5AF; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:46:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.222
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6qrkXiJcXkN; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:46:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2263412D5BA; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 00:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CKE50321; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:45:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:45:58 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.102]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:45:51 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHReoOjrZBVfyQeG0eqB0oT5R97aJ9SU9qQ
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:45:50 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92774E35E33@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <20160310015239.25364.91254.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160310015239.25364.91254.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.56E13447.00EA, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.102, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: edd14a939ef8788cc969ffe1ff681893
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CE-9-qcX5Fx2SKj6csX5UfZ00eo>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:46:04 -0000

Dear all, 

We have updated the BGP based PCE discovery draft to resolve the comments received during IETF94 meeting. 

The main changes are:

1. Specify the limitation in IGP based discovery, and improve the use cases of BGP based discovery mechanism.
2. Explicitly specify that the interaction between BGP and IGP based discovery is out of scope. 
3. Modify the recommended protocol-ID value for PCE discovery information.
4. Improve the operational considerations.
5. Editorial changes.

Any further review comments are welcome and authors believe this revision is ready for wg adoption. 

Many thanks,
Jie (on behalf of co-authors)

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 9:53 AM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


        Title           : BGP Extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery
        Authors         : Jie Dong
                          Mach(Guoyi) Chen
                          Dhruv Dhody
                          Jeff Tantsura
	Filename        : draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04.txt
	Pages           : 9
	Date            : 2016-03-09

Abstract:
   In networks where Path Computation Element (PCE) is used for
   centralized path computation, it is desirable for the Path
   Computation Clients (PCCs) to automatically discover a set of PCEs
   and select the suitable ones to establish the PCEP session.  RFC 5088
   and RFC 5089 define the PCE discovery mechanisms based on Interior
   Gateway Protocols (IGP).  This document describes several scenarios
   in which the IGP based PCE discovery mechanisms cannot be used
   directly.  In such scenarios, BGP might be suitable, thus this
   document specifies the BGP extensions for PCE discovery.  The BGP
   based PCE discovery mechanism is complementary to the existing IGP
   based mechanisms.



The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-dong-pce-discovery-proto-bgp-04


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/