Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Fri, 23 April 2021 01:33 UTC
Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7516D3A1EE8; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1C3WWf5cNMu; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7543A3A1EE6; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 18:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FRGp41zq9z6slZV; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:26:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) by fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 03:33:38 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.56) by dggpemm100001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:36 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) by dggpemm500003.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.56]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:36 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-koldychev-pce-multipath@ietf.org" <draft-koldychev-pce-multipath@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Thread-Index: AQHXMT4Mb9/Mv2m+jkCgj5/Ik6BfgqrBXsEw
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:33:36 +0000
Message-ID: <549a4a1076e9433bbd151d222fc02f55@huawei.com>
References: <CAP7zK5YG1A23K9y10b22_y89OYJ+pm6N8R9KhzKQRXDyfLoizg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP7zK5YG1A23K9y10b22_y89OYJ+pm6N8R9KhzKQRXDyfLoizg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_549a4a1076e9433bbd151d222fc02f55huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/CHGk005xRpGIDxuDkExHVH8hg2w>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:33:53 -0000
Yes, support, the draft is useful for SR Policy. Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multipath@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Wednesday 28th April. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien
- [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipat… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of draft-kol… Yadav, Bhupendra
- Re: [Pce] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of draft-kol… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
- Re: [Pce] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of draft-kol… Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Sivabalan, Siva
- Re: [Pce] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of draft-kol… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- [Pce] 答复: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Yangfan (IP Standard)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… hsyu
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Luc-Fabrice Ndifor Ngwa [ MTN Cameroon ]
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… olivier.dugeon
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Peng Liu | 刘鹏
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Wangyali(Yali,Data Communication Standards and Patents Dept)
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-mult… Dhruv Dhody