[Pce] Thought on SRP flags

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 16 November 2016 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED9E12954A; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LILuN_HRUa13; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686A4129525; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:03:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAG83ETv024676; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:03:14 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-8717.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.135.23]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id uAG834Pv024625 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:03:12 GMT
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:03:01 -0000
Message-ID: <06f201d23fdf$e06bbe20$a1433a60$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdI/32jJpkEbQoCSQDC76wO2vn5LoA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22702.005
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.476-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.476-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 5saoGwUzKRBs2M2McsO4c3BRIrj8R47F4+ZcrqvCDkFkljqvtoNIdmOS NUODX9wnK0FqxWGrDzR5OPD8XJFfpE1+zyfzlN7y/sToY2qzpx5q8/xv2Um1avoLR4+zsDTtiPb fA0kXryHxVh1IYzJ0hmPmejq9mk/xLhOYx1I5+LrxKJWn1/H2nOh6vUQky8b7LLR5nF3ltXgVUh luC41uNBWJz0qF3xvHJIWB1QP6/JM=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/DiRDk2S7a8xu9VT-34W1ywzQjbM>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:03:18 -0000

Hi,

Just reading your I-D during the meeting (sorry, but better now than never :-)

I think we need a registry for the flags in the SRP registry.

Maybe that should be in draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce? But it could also be in
your document.

And if we need evidence that this is needed, your figure 1 shows the 'R' flag,
but there is no mention of it in the text, so I assume you have seen it in some
other document.

Cheers,
Adrian