[Pce] Feedback on draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors
Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 17:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F3C3A1DE2 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KS6NwXRA2Xes for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C3D3A1DCE for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id k19so1717333pfu.5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 May 2021 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t1oqkDnnZFlvFEZsXcIkv5RZLTuTbq653+GP5Ju8Uhg=; b=n+srg5iCcaxKpG4ayw1ai0VCPUJj3ksnbClya+mEmgc1BDaKGuj8FuhkQjLdGwLdQh Kf9seymWMNbsKt56Cxq+BF2c1WxKOZavqMiTRBCKfYGLd02lYIXyji6XfXK7+NBwwu2Q VEqmVumuEdBziWj6zG1G9tz0MKfddeg+kLexwZm+ftS7p5TZrh9ZyNS1mDIFoQpNwtVJ qtUtBpwSYTmps2d89w9OWVsB7jSybHLy2xfQx2/ojwiSZO69M8OvikPNGeRd+PdRdaD5 WJDk7P5pMZ4DEMXAvEG20/2jCOiMYJPS8Vpx+JMvQMgCzBanZH0yekq2IWKTfSpSOIwg pCbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t1oqkDnnZFlvFEZsXcIkv5RZLTuTbq653+GP5Ju8Uhg=; b=IxtTGQ0rrY2xW6MM8kkMLenO1QCARj6ACt64h4WH+7CocjARJbe0KyzaQk7ejB3Rom qSL9e6Gt/Jw22gaWkojTMiIztLpV339tpv5fn/5ZYMFp1cogeZ7SBKZKUNXhul0Sjv8x z4rjaRgNl6BFAi34eqgKkDlk+qFPdkWFraP4Jcp9sJgA4vv2//uAJF2ZrGiyZHkOD4B6 SDaS3qgh3mKcwiRwRrV15Bm11VCeNaBlsSZ7Zh9d7Bx0mhvNbpc+OABw4BHg/N/VSfqr /4SzfX6r0VsW0fMmL+mCyOPDdD1BRhfpq5qPX5hSte0wbgzwojCEV3rPQd7/D3YIClRp 0RTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TpKSSFQt4lFRDjjdSjBzGf0dvFRN5J0Xh3TPbs9Bp7GvaCzfH VBbrhpZncUD+PpqL2+2GMv77sj1VzPhTt8pzgQBBVr55R3dAwvgT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyf4Px7uOn8/9Bns1XC0tVG1fSTr4D/HaXo0KTgrm1PQ0TFDtzmW12vEoPWmMnw5KrgICPdzKgZmTVsoBFeuPQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:754d:0:b029:289:11e7:4103 with SMTP id q74-20020a62754d0000b029028911e74103mr18168829pfc.25.1620063550976; Mon, 03 May 2021 10:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 23:08:34 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5Z08i1M7B6gf=PH9usJNfmXBan3Rgxi3A3dUCdpZm+XOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078474505c170702f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/F3DjqgfF-2F5xKqXzs6j1eyFh0k>
Subject: [Pce] Feedback on draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 17:39:15 -0000
Hi WG, The WG I-D draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors enhances the error and notification handling in PCEP. It is one of the older I-Ds that has changed editorship multiple times. We do not see the enhanced mechanism specified in this I-D being utilized by any other document yet. We would like to understand if there is still interest in publishing this as an RFC. Could you also state your reasoning? Please provide your feedback by Monday, 17th May. Thanks! PCE Chairs
- [Pce] Feedback on draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Feedback on draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-err… Zhenghaomian