Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACDD120047; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 04:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7AsDAN4Ue6V; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 04:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557AF120044; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 04:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id k5so2324402iol.5; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NhM9yKIuOOBc+bT/4jBT95ih0Twsmo2f5afDwFN700I=; b=lE1MTA9lLO8AHdvU6J2xinDTR4TTjUVle3M3wIzvmv4uN12qvrc3QYH7xuoAe7ls85 Aib5Ft1nsnZmtK8LIkTokrw+Z5BSwZ8lPJiGP294AdHLBBBFsWClwFKbxuwRxdtUL4QM caLQQ5kuNy3n4nvXf6e6EVhHgC0QuvC9lNW364lv7OqzU8o7AH/RgZxLzhcTgiyJSIQ5 8I+hlYnrRF8g3YyrDPOUTB9NXxwyCNBeegMSzYdHBbIarmvzMW7KmudE7i9s79F+sAtW 5/mPL3mhKDO4GAFwPGAsNYyi9QTcXXEggTAMOpy+6Kno54bBubjzJAIPM7Nw4z8L0KRx C1JA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NhM9yKIuOOBc+bT/4jBT95ih0Twsmo2f5afDwFN700I=; b=O7zMKfUJVMnpXeazNuT4KV6nQk3X95ax5MCp3TOPkGgdjjMaY7OHEPPMbzQVvy8rDz DvxM5GV7Lq/XvjjS6tnTT8ZSGIaLjo47TA2fKZJYbWNu6sWcNAcuVA63N7uweCShoexu gAUv++gCLWd76fWYutqNpWVm7k3CIC3mvD2WcLPBjzzSQ/1liAjoFOh4HZEZjbb/MvXD ZIzwWAH1fnTDXTJv0I8pzE4UEL/nHmg2qFgSsQQnxmvSOB5LUOpXJ/3UNYfZhU8hjIct l5U8xppaG8iiFcaPzulzXupXbKciHGNW7pUza8txCUboIsVpb7GPZK8TynZGnpysfBx1 XAcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV71p+lpU77xA0zMd8u4Qc+HdDq8WRqO0bO0VwFqhreVllGdfkc sJZWXz4yyyntne3nz6ztevG5ojjFqGndeSARmhELuFCy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzazNN8sXkON8FiPYoQXURTzxf5MXvCwnjpEcpvngIyj6Xb+KhDKwMmsXbf7kHv6WtpFvyhEr0/tNyvPL628t0=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b78b:: with SMTP id h133mr8987230iof.276.1568027155233; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn6YcL4wXggWTBhfwOp_go32XaHFjaV+oEV-hdE7XjFuyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn6YcL4wXggWTBhfwOp_go32XaHFjaV+oEV-hdE7XjFuyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:35:18 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn6cFH-zYKkh-SzBRrpoT0j=cpbGa=mNfZCKBpCi5+UPmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/FOiXt_A9Wy1lgKJgTsM9hGNFyM0>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:05:58 -0000

Hi WG,

We have only one response so far. This is a focused small document, with
just 1-2 pages of the main content that updates a problem that was found
in RFC 8231. This might seem trivial but it is important as a WG that we
fix issues in our published RFCs and make it easier for later work and
implementations.

Please read and comment, if you feel the document should not be published,
please state your reason. We urge you to be vocal on the list either way,
you have another week as WG LC closes on 16th Sept.

Thanks!
PCE Chairs

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:43 PM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a 'working group last call' for
> draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01 [1]. This I-D is focused and has an
> uncontroversial fix to RFC 8231, we are moving it directly to WGLC. See [2]
> for context.
>
> Please indicate your support or concern for this draft.
>
> If you are opposed to the progression of the draft, please articulate your
> concern.
>
> If you support, please indicate that you have read the latest version and
> it is ready for publication.
>
> As always, review comments and nits are most welcome.
>
> The WG LC will end on 16th September 2019.
>
> Thanks,
> PCE Chairs
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags/
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/tTkJKO34xTD0CY48IJCk5FjmiJ4