[Pce] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi Samuel,

Thanks for your review.

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 7:21 PM Samuel Sidor (ssidor) <ssidor=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Julien and PCE WG,
>
> I support progress of this document.
>
> 3 minor (non-blocking) comments:
> 1. Do we need to expand "PCEP" in document title? (It seems to be expanded
> in most of PCEP RFCs)
>

Dhruv: Fixed as "Update to the IANA PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Registration Procedures and Allowing Experimental Error Codes"; PCE is
marked as well-known by RFC-Editor
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=abbrev_list


> 2. In section 3.1, shouldn't we use normative SHOULD/MUST when specifying
> what an "experiment" should/will do? (I understand that the whole section
> is even called as "Advice ...", so it seems that it is not really
> specifying requirements. However, in reality, it seems to be defining
> required behavior for anyone using experimental error types/values.


Dhruv: I personally prefer to not use normative keywords when they do not
apply to protocols or their implementations :)


> 3. Just a note: If I haven't missed anything, American English is used in
> most of PCEP drafts. I can see a few words from British English
> ("recognise", "synchronised",..) in this draft. That should be fine as long
> as we are not mixing American and British English in a single document (I
> don't see a specific example of some a word that would be specific to
> American English. I'm just raising this because there is a chance that
> could happen during merge of 2 drafts into current one).
>
>
Dhruv: Thanks. Fixed.

Commit ->
https://github.com/ietf-wg-pce/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/commit/493c08e19c56fc3a72d6c4102e230173de01d2e0

Diff ->
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?doc_1=draft-ietf-pce-iana-update&url_2=https://ietf-wg-pce.github.io/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update.txt

Thanks!
Dhruv



> Thanks a lot,
> Samuel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2024 2:24 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-iana-update
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since we have consensus, let's move forward with this simple fix to [1],
> as agreed with the IESG. This message starts a 2-week WG last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01 [2]. Please share your support or comments
> on the PCE mailing list by Friday September 20.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Julien
>
>
> [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C519
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-01
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>