Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11

xiong.quan@zte.com.cn Tue, 26 September 2023 07:19 UTC

Return-Path: <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55008C15153F; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w1f18EJdPLIY; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECA9C151531; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Rvrj92gm5z8XrRQ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:19:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Rvrhd5821z4xVbw; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:19:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 38Q7Ixh1084399; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:18:59 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiong.quan@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app07[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:19:02 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:19:02 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2aff651285e625b-723f6
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202309261519023457206@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
To: dd@dhruvdhody.com
Cc: draft-chen-pce-bier@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 38Q7Ixh1084399
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 6512860D.003/4Rvrj92gm5z8XrRQ
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Id3EfMEvhKETHm4IdM8LA1wa47M>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:19:53 -0000

Hi Dhruv and WG,

I support the adoption of this draft. 
I have reviewed the updated version and this draft can support the BIER-TE path establishment with PCEP extesnsions.
The PCEP extensions is well-written including the BIER-TE related objects and procedures.
Before adoption, I suggest to fix the abbreviation of BIER-TE and clarify the "TE" to Tree Engineering. 
And I also noticed that the Figure 2, 3 and 4 has no figure name. It may be better if this can be fixed in next version.

Best Regards,
Quan






<Hi WG, 
< This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-bier-11.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/
<Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG?
< Please state your reasons -
 <Why / Why not? 
<What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? 
<Are you willing to work on this draft? 
<Review comments should be posted to the list. 
< Please respond by Monday 9th Oct 2023. 
< Please be more vocal during WG polls!
 <Thanks! Dhruv & Julien