Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pceps-14
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Wed, 16 August 2017 02:35 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B53513232C for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFZ3D3HhTzYH for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E9713246D for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.106]) by resqmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id hoBEdWS3f8zp5hoBGdDOAC; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:35:38 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4603:9471:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id hoBEdg5WI6bpPhoBFdjYAv; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:35:38 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v7G2ZZuL019519; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:35:35 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v7G2ZZ4l019516; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:35:35 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-pceps.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, dhruv.ietf@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8CB98624@blreml501-mbb> (dhruv.dhody@huawei.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:35:35 -0400
Message-ID: <87mv70utmw.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfODU7UPMr264N0dQW6q4ogRecsmwWpLhcikEfRQjr+e5MUxovo38FhEvu5sdKRlmIW0tyLJExzzPxOvYFUyrYTSmDIfPR/A1QBQQPUzzJoflWKNyKUzq hKuIf5Ws1k3lTXGiTwOzE4Ps3ZAQjxifIQu7E0gHhJx+m+6h/uQtSOuNs5yGUZR0bgwuPl/DUU/asBOJPlcZy4QxR54xk/o6NVOkB1OEy8yne3KyO3/di+ht tznyZh1oegsavet+PmJ65BXBrpfgsuQTJqcgfKjgvi5trAbw8t7tLWClYNYjyWD9U2r2IhTLbCv4Ho2Pt/mO8A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Idep2ORmjP2iljUQeWL3Tm2Tmtc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pceps-14
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:35:42 -0000
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> writes: > [[Dhruv Dhody]] I have added this in the backward compatibility session to note this concern - > > Note that, a PCEP implementation that support PCEPS would respond > with PCErr message with Error-Type set to [TBA2 by IANA] (PCEP > StartTLS failure) and Error-value set to 2 if any other message is > sent before StartTLS or Open. If the sender of the invalid message > is a PCEP implementation that does not support PCEPS, it will not be > able to understand this error. A PCEPS implementation could also > send the PCErr message as per [RFC5440] with Error-Type "PCEP session > establishment failure" and Error-value "reception of an invalid Open > message or a non Open message" before closing the session. You are, of course, the author. But my opinion is that you'd get cleaner compatibility by sending a 1/1 error in this situation. Dale
- [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-p… Dale Worley
- Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-p… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-p… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-p… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-p… Dale R. Worley
- Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-p… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-p… Dale R. Worley