Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 19 December 2019 16:11 UTC
Return-Path: <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707A61200F1; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGmUQs4N7DqE; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9C41200A4; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:11:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 18so2386111oin.9; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:11:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J/iOxgunjXfisH3+MbQnHtoqdhqQ9vhQW8eEk7JEn2g=; b=K/LT8FKmOeUAv39ii13BOw6ybwot1/sHs/aqchhj2fvO9rM4GSdA6fGfEQk+mDMGym bosTyL2CrMafBnuMk+tqqBjvijyJaCSFP4e+cJAjfh3KO+20aDtPrLl84HVJmNe4Lpsp QVsM/vZI0HX+kWrm6mcgg1+5jxwb76sOh8Q7W3pOs/zSs5UY7FJBAI2DX6TsTni5PsgV a5a4nIyfC1s7EXuyXRRo0QRnjR1HasupAIMteaGhbtUhKUp97H/DSvvahBWzrCB+GgMf Z5H6MbTEvyai6+8SZSDDkBTZAJnUUdyfJRRq4Z8HshRvOd+1CrfgGvrI0xF6SmfeOX6r 99PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J/iOxgunjXfisH3+MbQnHtoqdhqQ9vhQW8eEk7JEn2g=; b=Vph/aCAJiNAq4H4Mu6G+1zxspy5uOeyLTuEtd8AWUH6UkIZmb9gC1ZTXWwpuGH7EYh pWd+TVM3HsWBXMZEyzI65E9hJcfPsk9dXUqVLla9CEPjGItu7cYaVMBFvmvyVlf0abpw zNPsQ9SFFOZOD38EYgOFzNa/S9fZekYyAw74ScJGeKwuoIzZswQrht3xdR6PhE4ZMgcM DVbD3Rd2nytrDZom3aoBV2BAJMOJzFfarbdNMW+SgI5OdN20ifPEzQ2rwMxVb2IScgWB 1w/3nW2NbTW5jk5uRjH12RQeyc+SaIuRXGhGRpIzeDQKCfT9pDQYEzlNQ5Q+Y5M+ZW9q 0cMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVz985kj7dSBWKZY3PffXqyjl7nwKtl0gyN8CRXSi4KD2ThXFKx gVvyrNqVAYjlybbH2btMAikTCKdumTd0TX0bwx+6W/oSTbo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzUS378zQDgSjqlDCDZYs0EyQcxbEcjWQaVzVTAkEYug9M1HhVJ9aTH3cTQlYNn1P6R4ldDesDdTWgXughtB/o=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:2407:: with SMTP id n7mr1026579oic.14.1576771889006; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:11:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157249259096.32511.2692078197358707202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157249259096.32511.2692078197358707202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 21:41:16 +0530
Message-ID: <CAM5Nu_wN6JoQDuQ2W_R78Y-s26LywFxhOGyhk2n6=+AgDmJsHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity@ietf.org, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000560d30059a10d0ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/J9rkZIRCN_oDRBdwv1yTB7oaJ6Q>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 16:11:31 -0000
Hi Suresh, Thanks for the review, all the comments are addressed in new version. New version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-13 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-13 Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-13 Regards, Mahendra On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:59 AM Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker < noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-12: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Section 5.3: > Given the fairly relaxed handling of multiple OF-codes ("the receiver > MUST > consider the first OF-code only and ignore others if included") I think > the > error handling as specified in > > "the OF-code inside the OF Object MUST include one of the disjoint OFs > defined > in this document. If this condition is not met, the PCEP speaker MUST..." > > needs to be tightened a bit since all the OF-codes but the first are > ignored > for processing but still considered for error handling. Suggest something > like > this > > OLD: > the OF-code inside the OF Object MUST include one of the disjoint OFs > defined > in this document. > > NEW: > the first OF-code inside the OF Object MUST be one of the disjoint OFs > defined > in this document. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Looks like the placeholder TBD8 is being used for two totally different > purposes (a new bit in the NO-PATH-VECTOR TLV and the Error-value for > DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION-TLV missing) and this is confusing. Please > deconflict. > > >
- [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce… Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
- Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf… Mahend Negi