IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A91C12080A; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQpvPJVo2Psf; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F7E120046; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id s21so13999300ioa.1; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gXcHGNWVInDuSdt/Gy83aWk01ZiXOB1ZNfgDDOTxs2U=; b=NvUcxwIj+N+vcU/BEgRawBDKimATADHIUmYd9O7yPEWowv4ILpMfXVEAZHhmb+24J2 Ym57H8/W+z0w2hbvZOlDARWuVzzX6IL/90pa9FqsDCJj1Wkhmz57SAwHeaNPRedNXB8V UNzscSS2cMd9BEXnCOnxxnsRdppYQEWdSIdUJYDz1mF8iOKKpnRBjI0sqcZVF9xqlwa2 kWr3LcJ2Y4MruyHWi7bUinmCBTIT/zMlEPvcImKG5PeGBXP+fDD3RgbbxTrySA3pW4Ta E10nwFH1icfCiQt8NWNiMPwARcCJ3oMN+FD4itnh3Wv0ZS3opZQVZesmMSIXe4wFcknO oJOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gXcHGNWVInDuSdt/Gy83aWk01ZiXOB1ZNfgDDOTxs2U=; b=VcODsm6GarsfziFy34hFGRAeYyp15WB+kbI9ZyoAln5xaNegq3basIyGj4ZWTQnnhS iucKCRys/h2amjOOGT3xUIoZ+/dm3BlKsD4xphacAVfY0yKG5p8kwi/nX2RQ4/y+aVdc QobHrCNVaFDjXvkoYgtlhNzOxRkfD/5Eo79Ta53daJ2SIJFU9pY77LUZhjdwQemV6402 BAHTcujpXgUPvcMTxzAnQivUWyeZHQLmE2RRAsCjglJye/2g7dt1iYuGQ3rRS+JFBXVn aE4JFVjIP6DAQSR8u+tLJ8eBKSaTOgsdFa/dLx8Nu7U3Xw5RCPRK373pUlK+WRedsqq6 WbvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVtSVIGLXdhdyE2rFcen8r8ddjquKjmcHHlaPfjprutRbwlcOFE FS86jbvGaC8jugxNOS2fHFr4Kk/6IgEQ4i0Kze4dysis
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBBoKOe6D+S+fs7cGR8Tgk5h+bH5fv1iYWQfaaq49nuw//PTl68uuTmFkfRZYnG2Ub0rSixzZY1JlaF8y4aYE=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a405:: with SMTP id c5mr5099440jal.54.1566323112325; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:14:36 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn44Q8Y_eeGDfV+ecojJt0gKd9zHU4B7V0Xn_PYneCQAeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/JU4_2tkL6C5Hk4VLDyl7xsPwxF0>
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:45:19 -0000

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 [1].

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why /
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

One of the chairs did a pre-adoption review [2] and authors posted a new
revision. Note that there are known implementations.

This adoption poll will end on 6th September 2019.

Thanks!
Dhruv (for the chairs)


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07
[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oaBIRA9FnNsV6-JrKKRCdwtLysk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email