Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10
Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Mon, 13 May 2019 20:08 UTC
Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40D7120243 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNEXmjYpJTMZ for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc29.google.com (mail-yw1-xc29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC60120247 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc29.google.com with SMTP id q11so12069573ywb.0 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+4Mzn1ATYyN24cW5npVhJaDmycO4t8pWFzjcxn2cPVk=; b=kxwvMYk/K9zvX/T8wyfCDlnIFQUt36AMEYX5FM8NfvJEZK+yzUmiL1etKj2vPUOeKy HvyCSHBI53UY8Qh4/eR0nGbdu9ZkiAGr7LWSG6zTJ4QnGC7hpB1eheB2SVojqNgxzpIx 3QwyxHlyKnhWjhA8oDmwztrGu0T9WET/n0ASI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+4Mzn1ATYyN24cW5npVhJaDmycO4t8pWFzjcxn2cPVk=; b=JDkmY5O/0ccsmXoz9gQPFvOGSS4L87We8go1JJZ68oSvnmt+ic3CU/x3h37hnO59J3 jCRAp04A3lOmGptpGHVoZ8sDetmQBd94sn/tx3gd8Ffdhmf94clqcGHgdMMGkRa9cEV0 W0o+ZmHf9eBIYph694ic2i+1Ww49USl/DPJGwSZWq+Q1JILNF4PI9XJcDZ2YHEIlqOSa kxRF2D6meqZQ5ZumRkOHeeETN1kI3uuIDeWEfYMe75UMMkOAGN9NXrOi+spZw0I5+42b F6jHIDOIjeElYROUbT0v/nAEr7c2uDnPc6sA62HxVL/xPSC79spdTPlPB+O0ps9A1kH5 beqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4TWHuclZEG2bETa/1aqT5uRy8gBsp+H5LETGkdDrr5+Hle5AI OujbybFSyykTYiAFXrSCV4IkCj9itfzveLaZgOKuzg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzFKi3PTEoJXg1VXCnSdWHhAb8qnLRV52Xc6cDwyF6FukgAazZfGpbVsIIbuT9TC+kObAvCMcjlTugL3PVtirY=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d947:: with SMTP id b68mr8249420ywe.464.1557778110947; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155535945259.10773.14556389726269462856@ietfa.amsl.com> <007701d509c1$39535b80$abfa1280$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <007701d509c1$39535b80$abfa1280$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:08:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nVOyJSDmdN6_MVB68jVJ1Xn-_KchEL0inMSbVJ0TsKt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: daniel@olddog.co.uk
Cc: IETF SecDir <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions.all@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f13a5f0588ca7a2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/JWUPblfFcoI2-8PNIZnHLVfDPlY>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 20:08:35 -0000
Sounds great! I look forward to reviewing the new version. Thanks, Kyle On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 3:22 PM <daniel@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > Thank you for the review, it is most appreciated! > > We have addressed all your comments in the latest version of our I-D (v11) > but were advised to hold off posting until after the IESG telechat. > Comments inline (DK>>) on how we addressed said comments: >
- [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-h… Kyle Rose via Datatracker
- Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-p… daniel
- Re: [Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-p… Kyle Rose