Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 26 May 2021 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF103A2283 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4U1PamSor1B9 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 551F43A2282 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 May 2021 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml710-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Fqgkb2cxwz6Q3kv for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:18:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.189) by fraeml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:25:06 +0200
Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) by dggpemm100004.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.189) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:25:05 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.229]) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.229]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:25:04 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Adoption of draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync
Thread-Index: AQHXSyJLcHnt6gkGEEmgf7f4swqldar1V9/A
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 06:25:04 +0000
Message-ID: <033c24b000d84708857cca866b5ad559@huawei.com>
References: <eeea136e-cd42-28b2-1669-07b82b460410@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <eeea136e-cd42-28b2-1669-07b82b460410@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Jrcb5LrCgOEJpuJODcg09rJNR44>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 06:25:21 -0000

Hi,

I have read the document, and support the adoption.

One quick comments about the abstract section, it seems too details, it's better to more some of the content to the Introduction section.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> julien.meuric@orange.com
> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 9:41 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> The document draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync has reached the head of our
> adoption queue
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync/).
> 
> Do you consider this I-D is a good foundation for a WG item? Please share your
> feedback using the PCE mailing list by May 31.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dhruv & Julien
>