[Pce] 答复: Re: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

"qinfengwei" <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com> Mon, 20 January 2020 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14353120096; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:33:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tP9g2O9XZANb; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3173C120098; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:33:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.13]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45e251177dde-e125d; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:33:27 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45e251177dde-e125d
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmccPC (unknown[10.2.57.80]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee75e251175087-12cab; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:33:26 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee75e251175087-12cab
From: qinfengwei <qinfengwei@chinamobile.com>
To: pce-bounces@ietf.org, julien.meuric@orange.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
References: <2afd5e250ab0320-0000a.Richmail.00000040546491412971@chinamobile.com>
In-Reply-To: <2afd5e250ab0320-0000a.Richmail.00000040546491412971@chinamobile.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:33:31 +0800
Message-ID: <046301d5cf3a$018dca20$04a95e60$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0464_01D5CF7D.0FB10A20"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdXPNnlytzwPgBMvREW6Dxm3jJROBQAA2cFw
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/KfbETtomOZSCo7SnW7r3aPH35oU>
Subject: [Pce] 答复: Re: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 02:33:43 -0000

Hi all,

  I have read this document and think it very useful and mature enough to be a WG doc.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks & BR!

 

Fengwei Qin 

  _____  

From: Pce <pce-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of julien.meuric@orange.com <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 5:12 AM
To: pce@ietf.org <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06? 

 

Hi all,

It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien