Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
"chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn> Tue, 08 October 2019 03:23 UTC
Return-Path: <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B927120111 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ip_C6lvuvAe for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA0F12001E for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:2071.1348109172
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-183.40.220.223?logid-AE46FED8D7DE4961A2B2ED68F9D3ED0A (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id A936D2800A6; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:23:33 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 44093218@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id AE46FED8D7DE4961A2B2ED68F9D3ED0A for julien.meuric@orange.com; Tue Oct 8 11:23:35 2019
X-Transaction-ID: AE46FED8D7DE4961A2B2ED68F9D3ED0A
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 11:23:32 +0800
From: "chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <29713_1569428443_5D8B93DB_29713_96_1_6698a3d9-4ace-57fd-3b7c-7be23f135631@orange.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.12.322[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2019100811223095611029@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart382574121445_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Lvrmoa8YJOr99zLnFlB2S_rfbIU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:23:42 -0000
Hi WG, I support the adoption of this draft. The PCEP extension for path segment will benefit the automation deployment. Best Regards, Huanan From: julien.meuric@orange.com Date: 2019-09-26 00:20 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment? Hi PCE WG, In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be the foundation for a PCE WG's work item? Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt it. This poll will end on October 9. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
- [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment? julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… xiong.quan
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Khasanov Boris
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Mach Chen
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Greg Mirsky
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… qinfengwei
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Jeff Tantsura
- [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… julien.meuric
- Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segmen… Chengli (Cheng Li)