Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

"" <> Tue, 08 October 2019 03:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B927120111 for <>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ip_C6lvuvAe for <>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA0F12001E for <>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 20:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clientip- (unknown []) by (HERMES) with SMTP id A936D2800A6; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:23:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by App0024 with ESMTP id AE46FED8D7DE4961A2B2ED68F9D3ED0A for; Tue Oct 8 11:23:35 2019
X-Transaction-ID: AE46FED8D7DE4961A2B2ED68F9D3ED0A
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:23:32 +0800
From: "" <>
To: "" <>, "" <>
References: <>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart382574121445_=----"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:23:42 -0000

Hi WG,

       I support the adoption of this draft.
       The PCEP extension for path segment  will benefit the automation deployment. 

Best Regards,

Date: 2019-09-26 00:20
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?
In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there
for a little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now
like you to voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be
the foundation for a PCE WG's work item?
Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment
you would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt
it. This poll will end on October 9.
Dhruv & Julien
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
Pce mailing list