[Pce] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 May 2019 04:16 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions@ietf.org, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Message-ID: <155798018568.30707.1345795311254588749.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:16:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/Ncr0j2AUGt86A-li6nRTK7kvOok>
Subject: [Pce] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-extensions/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for a well-written document.  A couple of minor editorial comments:

— Section 3.2.2 —

   The value part comprises of -

We don’t say “comprises of”, and the dash isn’t right. Make it:

   The value part comprises:

— Section 3.3.2 —

   The usage of Domain-ID TLV, carried in an OPEN object, is used to

Remove “usage of”, as it’s redundant.

[Pce] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-pc… Barry Leiba via Datatracker