[Pce] 2 flags in draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid
Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com> Sat, 27 March 2021 03:07 UTC
Return-Path: <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82C63A1B81 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ISRawLUAXC9g for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83ADA3A1B7B for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id e14so1818136plj.2 for <pce@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dhruvdhody-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VJohm2zSt39HYunLD4dNrgl24vKYAEBEoDJ/eOGe5SA=; b=pQnFqbx3wjiKi7wQnyYj41tcXKnIleU8zbFKiUixg+lw2REv+3na5tsmDkiiwEx4IU kD1YR8b1nSI6KcN/0O20wsvlxndnAaCqVUhhZPEobw2eXJ/h8AClnxALYcFIDxsdQQTc WSQ/OhSjqGrrFgYZoMuUfJ0bJVdMM8XOIQwddLm4cIuZ7cdMegnX1GaWXVJ3mLMQIDQo 0crYZDm3C8qTLC5LFgPWIPSpHywWBrmdixItws0hiWQ25rmM7GvpPbX3xIFbQFF5E42d xh8XB8kPDqNAVCdkK5k3xJ0xuENxMOkgpfztM2NOB54rP4e67JVxXF8CsweY5Dabb5Bg Yz4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VJohm2zSt39HYunLD4dNrgl24vKYAEBEoDJ/eOGe5SA=; b=CxenUY3m7YqkYa/fa9r3zfVntgDdt6PIYYRXtftmbHq/BdoBtgdzLiAcOHxpxU3/f3 zeCxxv5qOHdPiEifE4gI2Cca5P5OhempaZlyMYlh4raCNvXeJogA7XzbcaJVOybWhewT 5De6FfXHXuHSYj1jo4ncbQ5te2hyD8yTTQTwGe0/6T9UD6p/2x07ize+QSNotg/x9Urv 4mj6HdEZfQ8qvV6O3TH5Ld5Iv6WcL56nT1lnDzbgu54i4hWKQ9ZHwi6NBDxUl6pVcCvh zewXxRUWECf3q3pHZcdVJ5TCQb3xYmMetRquFEoaNJ1DiuA/Y1bXN9aI4GVQ1cuAFWNH F2pQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531RekFUmQXx84bxNeQNkwVl0TFN8hoOR9N3hCE0qeczPluoZnbY mgxDZ7UJ9yFZu3+/vz9e/QByxCCx3w0PvJJM7kdEv5/e4VvUH8Xl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpaoDHjYsxatrucoAJMdhWIXmBoENVzbotqFJILhH4Vk2zJyo7flBrCeWL0Bm/aJap+hq1voL+05Kn2soJeFc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4894:: with SMTP id b20mr16946072pjh.50.1616814451779; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:36:55 +0530
Message-ID: <CAP7zK5ZjkYhQmEPtJfBKNSvb-VEkvYgNwxAzEj3S8JvGFMHHvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ODZGisT_Tq7aMmZ8QeE91FWHqIw>
Subject: [Pce] 2 flags in draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 03:07:35 -0000
Hi WG,
draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid defines 2 flags in TE-PATH-BINDING TLV -
o S-Flag: This flag encodes the "Specified-BSID-only" behavior. It
is used as described in Section 6.2.3 of
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy].
o I-Flag: This flag encodes the "Drop Upon Invalid" behavior. It is
used as described in Section 8.2 of
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy].
Adrian pointed out that this would make
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy a normative reference. Also
that the handling of these flags is not discussed further in this I-D
and seems to be applicable only with respect to the SR policy. The
change suggested is to have no flags defined in this I-D and a code
point registry created for the future.
Cheng suggested moving these flags to the SR Policy I-D
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp. This would simply move the
content from one WG I-D to another and should not have any technical
issue. Are there any concerns with this approach?
Thanks!
Dhruv