[Pce] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06 (Ends 2026-05-28)

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 14 May 2026 16:41 UTC

From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meuric@orange.com>
References: <177869025567.1156217.14319693213969247690@dt-datatracker-54557f87b8-lnrkh>
In-Reply-To: <177869025567.1156217.14319693213969247690@dt-datatracker-54557f87b8-lnrkh>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 17:41:48 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <029e01dce3c0$8f94ec80$aebec580$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQIPh3RZ55heVI/TF2iKq6LQqNrjP7WoaNXA
Content-Language: en-gb
Message-ID-Hash: ZZK5DII6WQKJXI5P3EAYNHSAXO4JBWIJ
CC: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: [Pce] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06 (Ends 2026-05-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/OQLttcmP57Vb6dOfH4QRaOMADxk>

Hi Julien, working group,

I'm personally particularly keen to seem the optical extensions (draft-lee-pce-pcep-ls-optical) proceed, and this is an important foundation for that work.

I've read this draft and sent review comments on several occasions. I think the current revision is ready for publication.

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Meuric via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: 13 May 2026 17:38
To: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06 (Ends 2026-05-28)

This message starts a WG Last Call for:
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06

This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-05-28

Abstract:
   In order to compute and provide optimal paths, Path Computation
   Elements (PCEs) require an accurate and timely Traffic Engineering
   Database (TED).  Traditionally, this TED has been obtained from a
   link state (LS) routing protocol supporting the traffic engineering
   extensions.

   This document extends the Path Computation Element Communication
   Protocol (PCEP) with Link-State and TE Information as an experimental
   extension to allow gathering more deployment and implementation
   feedback on the use of PCEP in this way.

File can be retrieved from:

Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
publication of this document by replying to this email keeping pce@ietf.org
in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are
highly appreciated.

Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1].
Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
found at [3].

Thank you.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list -- pce@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to pce-leave@ietf.org

[Pce] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06 (En… Julien Meuric via Datatracker
[Pce] 回复: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06… Lixiao(lx)
[Pce] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06… Adrian Farrel
[Pce] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-ls-06… Italo Busi