IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

"wangminxue@chinamobile.com" <wangminxue@chinamobile.com> Fri, 08 April 2022 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wangminxue@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84D63A18C8; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 19:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0S7RNProLYS7; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 19:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100D13A18C6; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 19:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee6624fa12eb76-3bc1f; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 10:42:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee6624fa12eb76-3bc1f
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from DESKTOP-KR7OIA4 (unknown[10.2.55.67]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea624fa12d4ea-e990a; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 10:42:54 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea624fa12d4ea-e990a
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 10:42:53 +0800
From: "wangminxue@chinamobile.com" <wangminxue@chinamobile.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org" <draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org>
References: <CAP7zK5bC95SwqbPC-Fm1-bTyAmaVOb-O5Bg4CKqe3tSe=LUzZQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.20.269[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202204081042531630161@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart833686364775_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/OQz3v-x6UoilD4zhF_fnbeWQC1Y>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 02:43:02 -0000

Hi chairs,
I support its adoption. Taking PMTU with PCEP is an important work to ensure the end-to-end SR path.



-------------------------------------
王敏学/ Wang Minxue
中国移动通信研究院 基础网络技术研究所 / China Mobile Research Institute
地址: 北京市西城区宣武门西大街32号创新大厦,100053
电话: 010-15801696688-33202
传真：010-63601087
Email: wangminxue@chinamobile.com
-------------------------------------
 
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2022-03-29 00:09
To: pce@ietf.org
CC: draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th April 2022.

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email