[Pce] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 09 September 2019 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A5C12007A; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth@ietf.org, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, adrian@olddog.co.uk, pce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.101.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <156804768952.28211.12510339549643163890.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 09:48:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/OYbKG107ZjTCL1cqjThzUJDZ__8>
Subject: [Pce] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-i?= =?utf-8?q?etf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:48:10 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for quickly addressing the TSV-ART review (and thanks to David for this
very clear and well explained review)! I would have preferred to actually see a
normative requirement as original proposed by David ("sample interval SHOULD
NOT be less than 1 minute") in section 5.2.1. Also I would have expected the
proposed new text to show up somewhere in section 4 (maybe even as a new
subsection).