Re: [Pce] Request for WG adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 05:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97F91200F3; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFOj-qMabJ-1; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 510C11200C7; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id i22so9537825ioh.2; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pSKISw+LDRYS4tQQ02y+64K6OTuu8eEo42+q+g3J9B4=; b=p7IOTV50LbhlTR2fquMY+UWpKKZloDdE4IMZa/zn++4tWDgLHKA50iBVsba56ZmK8J Ya0ucYrHTjd2lq5cKxold4iFlHEVLiGL4kAQVMAFf1fO/g6ghNeO78TxE0zEU8C/Bfdr 4/GpuSO71wE/i/ALbvM+8VGX56NU7/MYwL0lMeXPHqouUZEA+PUvxZ0FyqN+c1delHlG VdLOKhMYyoDMRQkziNriJmIFyOmyOXiIiIx/6Sa7iZySsCf54MdKLVDUOCjeCMwdVFkD m8LL/+UaY0XYIVdDlsbl8wCuX+G6fVLeftiirWoKbNNCnU3u4iQ7cyD0UeVTGSEU5C3+ +Jmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pSKISw+LDRYS4tQQ02y+64K6OTuu8eEo42+q+g3J9B4=; b=r1FQ5bdhVUnAMt5sGnGQPCJyCb6UmlMhWrXubfW4SS8gI5hwiHG1aC1hCA3O388RMn w2pZX1dpBYnEFDpzrn66m7PNnSn+YiqAD1xeSJlD8ZeqKzohD4g6UCk53jB5KU2bIeY4 r27suD9ZfF5yClKQpyLFKXAQnUk1Fmj3ktevJxAh4R1bXWMCAdKsnv8BBikEkJP43vJi iwy5gP6Nl42dVb5uY38tduOX/57njEIaCzrqseFW/XKzAXGmtbiWsYGVH6fiWU7iU5JT 2Ga4vdV/s5QdIp0qs5z9krOwHkJW5SDSRxL+i8AQdubMAvmokn2N9RcvUp9UQMIIPxv7 qptw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVr+eBAdzYEbNr6K6vcaDYcT8d+AQHtoTgQjhOWputjNpe0zg0V fdyVzk+Se5/gQhN8oawQz0RwtueNghXz+9HOFpo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAWz4e2tpx+QuBsovCP4KA6se+16Vsqqx5fPtSX4V61EeFk7OuYK31Lqvkt6tkMLf09eqWD/E8vwvVoWElKzM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:691:: with SMTP id i17mr1740792jab.70.1566277935337; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02685C1E@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02685C1E@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:41:39 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn42gjqvTz6r2Vv+mfBfW8quzzjRLRFxkqNJWpuG9R2NsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <chengli13@huawei.com>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, pce-chairs <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/PD0gBVSlhiGe_14CRqHHaArK0sU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Request for WG adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:12:20 -0000

Hi Cheng,

Thanks for the update and including the implementation status. Your
request for early code point is noted (and will be handled post
adoption). We will take this into consideration as we process the
adoption queue.

WG,

Please do not wait for the adoption call to review drafts, provide
comments to the authors early.

Check wiki for latest status - https://trac.ietf.org/trac/pce/wiki/WikiStart

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 7:37 PM Chengli (Cheng Li) <chengli13@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi WG and Chairs,
>
> We just updated the draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path.  Major modifications:
>
>     * add Implementation Status
>     * move SRv6 related text to appendix
>     * add Manageability Considerations
>
> Since the text is mature in this draft, we would like to ask for WG adoption for this draft (Though it has been waiting in WG adoption queue for a while.^-^)
>
> If possible, we would like to request IANA early allocation for helping implementation.
>
> Comments are welcome!
>
> Many thanks,
> Cheng
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:51 PM
> To: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi@cisco.com>; Quan Xiong <xiong.quan@zte.com.cn>; Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>; Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com>; Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>; Chengli (Cheng Li) <chengli13@huawei.com>; Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt has been successfully submitted by Cheng Li and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path
> Revision:       06
> Title:          PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Segment Routing (SR) Paths
> Document date:  2019-08-19
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          16
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path
> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06
>
> Abstract:
>    The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides
>    mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path
>    computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests.
>    The Stateful PCE extensions allow stateful control of Multiprotocol
>    Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Label Switched Paths
>    (LSPs) using PCEP.  Furthermore, PCEP can be used for computing paths
>    in Segment Routing (SR) TE networks.
>
>    This document defines PCEP extensions for grouping two reverse
>    unidirectional SR Paths into an Associated Bidirectional SR Path when
>    using a Stateful PCE for both PCE-Initiated and PCC-Initiated LSPs as
>    well as when using a Stateless PCE.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>