IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> Tue, 14 March 2017 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB2912943B; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=metaswitch.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EvJT3zva3-Ie; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08FF1293F9; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=metaswitch.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=zelG5aWmRQz3u4xZe2Bcn0+PN8CLgSQ/5lZqMqWefGI=; b=qKlMUekvxHvHTNnliIfKqVsPa8b+PhUe/C5Xq2vieKqtXog6SXRS6b//JQ5W5dyybphos6PItvBqaQnKdyhC5TAyWBcfir2v9UOzgAYdkANJBS47ZUJ0oc7sl2Hxhrl1B/WLeWgQxYhZwnDjXs8FT7xxRLJslsSUXWNgn2DdBSI=
Received: from BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.75.152) by BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.75.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.961.17; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:04:48 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.75.152]) by BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.75.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0961.021; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:04:48 +0000
From: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSnCksLhSxIljWzUK0GZ7I3/QKgqGTSokAgAALHoCAAMYPgA==
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:04:48 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0201MB19105C1BFEEFE816FF6F75FA84240@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <148943037921.9243.15715481484070651192.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <02ef01d29c41$70f69060$52e3b120$@olddog.co.uk> <ECFA6603-D2E5-47D1-9817-58E2CD8BD939@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <ECFA6603-D2E5-47D1-9817-58E2CD8BD939@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=metaswitch.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.137.0.242]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0201MB1910; 7:KdkKPOcVR6aRejTGtb4KgNUVCRk/HlGTL4XIaVJjQca7xX6kzLPvo7szu7w543LPAmV8U35mNnlsiPziwlJaT6f1invBbn4wK//lAQkhcLKblP7rPn0qC+aDDQgTKuhl33Nk6mo7IEvoUNzave0iHNQi+gAVTpV/RMADZSm839IJnyT8wN3J7Zuk4fe0Zy0DCuUINiijrXC32vgqZrRVFRIFnexfxRwr0PlzbLx0cqek6xgUqaiI3iVOGlPNFCt/l89hNl/PsoLwARiDWLAlv8owNZJM7K8sPxX2uuhK1TRERowWXI2GjrZw4ro8ML9eHokiMBR6pkAnyc29zslTLg==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 67a4fa38-b472-4b86-ebe6-08d46ac18cc2
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1910;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0201MB1910466AAA248EFFA974C0C884240@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705)(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123558025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1910; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1910;
x-forefront-prvs: 02462830BE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39450400003)(24454002)(377454003)(13464003)(3660700001)(76176999)(50986999)(2906002)(54356999)(4326008)(229853002)(8936002)(230783001)(9686003)(3280700002)(66066001)(6506006)(53546007)(7736002)(122556002)(305945005)(2950100002)(53936002)(7696004)(556974002)(81166006)(33656002)(55016002)(8676002)(106116001)(74316002)(5660300001)(99286003)(54906002)(25786008)(2900100001)(189998001)(6436002)(3846002)(102836003)(77096006)(6116002)(6246003)(2501003)(38730400002)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1910; H:BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: metaswitch.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Mar 2017 10:04:48.6555 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d9e56eb-f613-4ddb-b27b-bfcdf14b2cdb
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0201MB1910
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/QO78pZdNYqhL1Q4wRuymqDaVg6E>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:04:51 -0000

I also agree and I think the right thing to do is to make PCEPS a normative reference, as Alvaro suggested.  We should have PCEPS submitted for publication in time for the Chicago meeting, so we can all "just get on with it".

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Retana (aretana) [mailto:aretana@cisco.com] 
Sent: 13 March 2017 22:13
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09: (with COMMENT)

On 3/13/17, 5:33 PM, "iesg on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <iesg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Ideally, everyone just gets on with it and the security update is 
> handled by draft-ietf-pce-pceps.

I agree.  That security update doesn’t belong in this document.

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email