[Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Thu, 31 August 2017 02:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis@ietf.org, Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com>, pce-chairs@ietf.org, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com, pce@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150414552903.16896.13672149203420824576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:12:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/QYjoPAbyPUDePUGhojnC_Lorm4I>
Subject: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-03: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Appendix A:

Did you mean "responses" instead of "requests" in this sentence?

"Update to the reply message to allow for bundling of multiple
      path computation requests..."

* I agree with Benoit and Mirja that summarizing all the changes since RFC6006
would be useful (Thanks for doing this for the RBNF!)

[Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-iet… Suresh Krishnan
Re: [Pce] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft… Dhruv Dhody