Re: [Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update

Dhruv Dhody <> Tue, 15 March 2016 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DC912D884; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71XYQCJKpPSO; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 693FF12D6F2; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGB00056; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:41:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:41:03 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:10:55 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <>
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update
Thread-Index: AdF+PUH1fEjOgyz/A0asm9wWqoO/VAALsDyQ
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:40:54 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8C6AFD47BLREML509MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.56E78451.010D, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 096de7febace2539d5c0fea18606ffcf
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 03:41:10 -0000

Hi WG,

I have made the update. See ¨C

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There's also a htmlized version available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Thanks Deborah for suggested improvements!


This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

From: Pce [] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: 15 March 2016 03:44
Subject: [Pce] AD review: draft-ietf-pce-iro-update


I¡¯ve done my AD review of this document and only had a few comments:

¡¤         I¡¯ve provided the author with some editorial suggestions to improve the abstract and introduction.
¡¤         As the survey document will not be progressed to RFC, it will be best to remove the reference to it from this document, and reword a bit these sentences on it.

Dhruv is updating the document for these edits and I¡¯ll then start the IETF Last Call.