[Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 17 February 2021 05:31 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, dd@dhruvdhody.com, dd@dhruvdhody.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161353990629.27125.2142403389593311265@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 21:31:46 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/R0f73ftnUlx369Ok9dAw7R4T8ps>
Subject: [Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The figures in Section 3 repeatedly state use the phrase "reports the reverse
LSP1
   (not shown for simplicity)". Not being an expert in these technologies, I
   found the consistent omission of this from the figure to be confusing, not
   clarifying.

[Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-pc… Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: [Pce] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-iet… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)