IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

"licong@chinatelecom.cn" <licong@chinatelecom.cn> Mon, 22 June 2020 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <licong@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31853A0A40 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kslzznnqPgoB for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549C63A0A32 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 03:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.92:34729.981674822
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-120.244.152.225?logid-d67597712b464ad58e98ccefba405aa9 (unknown [172.18.0.92]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 059E62800B7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:06:58 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 71080549@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.92]) by App0021 with ESMTP id d67597712b464ad58e98ccefba405aa9 for pce@ietf.org; Mon Jun 22 18:07:00 2020
X-Transaction-ID: d67597712b464ad58e98ccefba405aa9
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: licong@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.92
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: licong@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:06:58 +0800
From: "licong@chinatelecom.cn" <licong@chinatelecom.cn>
To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
References: <CAB75xn7p9jntgHJpdCVvUooZOMU_WsJfDAQ08hdkT6L6vMfSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.16.188[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020062218065770452927@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart438864570743_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/RxZfYvsfDfWG9OEoyTp1uoZCNk0>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:07:14 -0000

Hi WG,

I support the adoption of this work.

Best regards,
Cong Li

From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2020-06-07 15:45
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06
Hi WG,
 
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06.
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp/06/
 
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to
the list.
 
This adoption poll will end on 22nd June 2020.
 
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email