IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Two working group last calls

Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com> Wed, 12 March 2008 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29AA28C3AA; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UIUpY6qDKOw; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232C73A6AE8; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4FC28C3A3 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXC7GixLaQbo for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (unknown [61.144.161.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA2028C2E3 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JXL00G91HT4AW@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:05:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from M55527 ([10.111.12.186]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JXL008JOHT1XP@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for pce@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:05:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:05:26 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Message-id: <200803121005245480719@huawei.com>
Organization: Huawei
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Foxmail 6, 10, 201, 20 [cn]
References: <016f01c883b0$645da2c0$8c148182@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Two working group last calls
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

Here are some comments about the BRPC draft:
 
   1、In the middle of Section 4.2
 
   "Note that PCE(i) only considers the entry BNs that provide
   connectivity from domain(i-1).  That is, the set BN-en(k,i-1) is only
   made of those BNs that provide connectivity from domain (i-1) to
   domain(i).  Furthermore, some BNs may be excluded according to policy
   constraints (either due to local policy or policies signaled in the
   path computation request)."
 
   As the definition of VSPT(i), is the "BN-en(k,i-1)" should be "BN-en(k,i)" ?
 
   
   2、In the draft, there are severval places using "BR", "BR-en", "BR-ex", but there is no such definition about "BR", if I am correct, I guess it should be "BN", "BN-en", "BN-ex". Please check.


Best regards,
Mach

  
On 2008-03-12, at 03:45:49 Adrian Farrel wrote:

>Hi,
>
>As discussed in the PCE WG meeting, this email commences a two week working 
>group last call on the following two drafts.
>
>BRPC
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-brpc-07.txt
>
>Inter-AS PCEP requirements
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-interas-pcecp-reqs-04.txt
>
>Please send comments to the list.
>
>The last call will end on Monday March 31st at 12 noon GMT. That is almost 
>three weeks (because it overlaps with the IETF meeting) but please review 
>early and often.
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Pce mailing list
>Pce@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email